CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tousignant, G.
Right arrow Articles by Tessler, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tousignant, G.
Right arrow Articles by Tessler, M. J.

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol 41, 865-869, Copyright © 1994 by Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society

ARTICLES

Light intensity and area of illumination provided by various laryngoscope blades

G Tousignant and MJ Tessler
Department of Anaesthesia, Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Canada.

Several brands of laryngoscopes and commonly used blades are evaluated for differences in direct light intensity and area of illumination. The purpose of this study was to determine which laryngoscope/blade combination provided the best lighting conditions for tracheal intubation. The direct light intensity was assessed by directing various laryngoscope/blade combinations towards a multifunction exposure meter (Flash Meter III, Minolta Corp.). Light intensity expressed in Lux was calculated using the formula: lux = 2.5 x 2 exposure index. The area of illumination provided by the laryngoscopes was assessed by taking photographs when the laryngoscope blade tips were touching a wall. The widest diameter of bright illumination in the photograph was measured in centimeters (cm). The direct light intensity ranged from 0.4-5.5 x 10(3)lux. The field of illumination ranged from 3.2 to 8.8 cm. When fitted on regular size handles, blades with incandescent bulbs provided more intense light than blades using fibreoptic light sources (P = 0.0078). For blades using incandescent light, the use of a short handle laryngoscope resulted in a decrease in light intensity (P = 0.0117). The results of this study suggest that blades using incandescent light provide greater light intensity than blades using fibreoptics.




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1994 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.