CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Komatsu, T.
Right arrow Articles by Shimada, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Komatsu, T.
Right arrow Articles by Shimada, Y.

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol 42, 1003-1009, Copyright © 1995 by Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society


ARTICLES

Differential effects of ketamine and midazolam on heart rate variability

T Komatsu, PK Singh, T Kimura, K Nishiwaki, K Bando and Y Shimada
Department of Anesthesiology, Nagoya University School of Medicine, Japan.

Alterations in autonomic activity caused by anaesthesia can be assessed by spectral analysis of heart rate variability (HRV). This study examined the effects of ketamine and midazolam on HRV. Thirty patients of ASA PS 1 were studied. Fifteen were given ketamine (2 mg.kg-1) and 15 received midazolam (0.3 mg.kg-1), iv. The RR intervals of ECG were measured before and after induction of anaesthesia for ten minutes during spontaneous respiration. Power spectral density of the data was computed using fast Fourier transform. The spectral peaks within each measurement were calculated: low frequency area (LF, 0.04-0.15 Hz), high frequency area (HF, 0.15-0.5 Hz), and total power (TP, 0.04-0.5 Hz). Normalized unit power was derived as follows: low frequency area (nuLF): LF/TP x 100%, high frequency area (nuHF): HF/TP x 100%. Both ketamine and midazolam caused reductions in all measurements of HRV power (P < 0.05). However, ketamine increased nuLF from 64 +/- 14% to 75 +/- 13% (P < 0.05) and decreased nuHF from 36 +/- 14% to 25 +/- 13% (P < 0.05), while midazolam decreased nuLF from 66 +/- 15% to 54 +/- 14% (P < 0.05) and increased nuHF from 34 +/- 15% to 46 +/- 14% (P < 0.05). These results documented that both ketamine and midazolam reduced the total power and all frequency components of power in spite of their opposing effects on autonomic nervous activity. However, normalized unit power showed the expected sympathetic activation with ketamine and sympathetic depression with midazolam since ketamine increased nuLF and midazolam decreased nuLF.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
N. N. Win, H. Fukayama, H. Kohase, and M. Umino
The Different Effects of Intravenous Propofol and Midazolam Sedation on Hemodynamic and Heart Rate Variability
Anesth. Analg., July 1, 2005; 101(1): 97 - 102.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Emerg. Med. J.Home page
M C Howes
Ketamine for paediatric sedation/analgesia in the emergency department
Emerg. Med. J., May 1, 2004; 21(3): 275 - 280.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
M. Kawase, T. Komatsu, K. Nishiwaki, M. Kobayashi, T. Kimura, and Y. Shimada
Heart Rate Variability and Arterial Blood Pressure Variability Show Different Characteristic Changes During Hemorrhage in Isoflurane-Anesthetized, Mechanically Ventilated Dogs
Anesth. Analg., January 1, 2002; 94(1): 16 - 21.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
M. Kawase, T. Komatsu, K. Nishiwaki, T. Kimura, Y. Fujiwara, T. Takahashi, and Y. Shimada
Heart rate variability during massive hemorrhage and progressive hemorrhagic shock in dogs
Can J Anesth, August 1, 2000; 47(8): 807 - 814.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1995 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.