CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Aoyama, K.
Right arrow Articles by Shigematsu, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Aoyama, K.
Right arrow Articles by Shigematsu, A.

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol 42, 1010-1016, Copyright © 1995 by Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society


ARTICLES

The triple airway manoeuvre for insertion of the laryngeal mask airway in paralyzed patients

K Aoyama, I Takenaka, T Sata and A Shigematsu
Department of Anesthesiology, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, School of Medicine, Kitakyushu, Japan.

The efficacy of the triple airway manoeuvre (mouth opening, head extension and jaw thrust) for insertion of the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) was compared with the standard insertion method. One hundred paralyzed patients were allocated randomly into two groups: in the control group (n = 50) the LMA was inserted by the standard method, and in the other (TAM group, n = 50) by the triple airway manoeuvre. In ten patients of each group, the position of the LMA and the epiglottis was assessed radiographically before insertion, after insertion but before cuff inflation, and after cuff inflation. In all patients the position was examined using fibrescopy before and after cuff inflation. The mean distance between the epiglottis and the posterior pharyngeal wall, measured radiographically before LMA insertion, was greater in the TAM group (16.3 (SD 4.3) mm) than in the control group (7.0 (2.8) mm) (P < 0.001). Before cuff inflation, radiography and fibrescopy showed that the LMA compressed the epiglottis downwards more frequently in the control group. After cuff inflation the glottis was completely visible fibreoptically in 66% in the TAM group, compared with 14% in the control group (P < 0.001). Complete downfolding of the epiglottis was seen in 10% in the control group and none in the TAM group (P < 0.05). We conclude that in paralyzed patients LMA insertion with the triple airway manoeuvre provides wider pharyngeal space and decreases the incidence of epiglottic downfolding by the LMA compared with the standard method.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1995 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.