| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol 42, 1017-1023, Copyright © 1995 by Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society
ARTICLES |
J Brimacombe
Department of Anaesthesia, Cairns Base Hospital, Australia.
A meta-analysis was performed on randomised prospective trials comparing the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) with other forms of airway management to determine if the LMA offered any advantages over the tracheal tube (TT) or facemask (FM). Of the 858 LMA publications identified to December 1994, 52 met the criteria for the analysis. Thirty-two different issues were tested using Fisher's method for combining the P values. The LMA has 13 advantages over the TT and four over the FM. The LMA had two disadvantages over the TT and one over the FM. There were 12 issues where neither device had an advantage. Advantages over the TT included: increased speed and ease of placement by inexperienced personnel; increased speed of placement by anaesthetists; improved haemodynamic stability at induction and during emergence; minimal increase in intraocular pressure following insertion; reduced anaesthetic requirements for airway tolerance; lower frequency of coughing during emergence; improved oxygen saturation during emergence; and lower incidence of sore throat in adults. Advantages over the FM included: easier placement by inexperienced personnel; improved oxygen saturation; less hand fatigue; and improved operating conditions during minor paediatric otological surgery. Disadvantages over the TT were lower seal pressures and a higher frequency of gastric insufflation. The only disadvantage compared with the FM was that oesophageal reflux was more likely. The importance of these findings in terms of patient outcome could not be determined from the published data.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. M. Cooper ProSeal LMA how long is too long?/Le LMA ProSeal Combien de temps est trop long? Can J Anesth, October 1, 2007; 54(10): 786 - 789. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J Hulme and G D Perkins Critically injured patients, inaccessible airways, and laryngeal mask airways Emerg. Med. J., October 1, 2005; 22(10): 742 - 744. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. A.E. Shephard The changing pattern of anesthesia, 1954-2004: a review based on the content of the Canadian Journal of Anesthesia in its first half-century: [La transformation du modele de l'anesthesie, 1954-2004 : une revue fondee sur le contenu du premier demi-siecle du Journal canadien d'anesthesie] Can J Anesth, March 1, 2005; 52(3): 238 - 248. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Brimacombe, W. Laupu, and C. Keller Time to Dispose of Nondisposable LMAs Anesth. Analg., March 1, 2005; 100(3): 897 - 897. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D Trevisanuto, M Micaglio, P Ferrarese, and V Zanardo The laryngeal mask airway: potential applications in neonates Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., November 1, 2004; 89(6): F485 - F489. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Renner, M. Hohlrieder, T. Wolk, F. Puhringer, A. T. Kleinsasser, C. Keller, and A. Benzer Administration of 100% Oxygen Before Removal of the Laryngeal Mask Airway Does Not Affect Postanesthetic Arterial Partial Pressure of Oxygen Anesth. Analg., January 1, 2004; 98(1): 257 - 259. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T.-H. Han, J. Brimacombe, E.-J. Lee, and H.-S. Yang The laryngeal mask airway is effective (and probably safe) in selected healthy parturients for elective Cesarean section: a prospective study of 1067 cases : [Le masque larynge est efficace et, probablement, sans risque pour une cesarienne non urgente chez des parturientes en bonne sante : une etude prospective de 1 067 cas] Can J Anesth, December 1, 2001; 48(11): 1117 - 1121. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Sidaras and J. M. Hunter Editorial III: Is it safe to artificially ventilate a paralysed patient through the laryngeal mask? The jury is still out Br. J. Anaesth., June 1, 2001; 86(6): 749 - 753. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V Dörges, H Ocker, V Wenzel, C Sauer, and P Schmucker Emergency airway management by non-anaesthesia house officers--a comparison of three strategies Emerg. Med. J., March 1, 2001; 18(2): 90 - 94. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
P. T-L. Choi, S. H. Halpern, N. Malik, A. R. Jadad, M. R. Tramer, and B. Walder Examining the Evidence in Anesthesia Literature: A Critical Appraisal of Systematic Reviews Anesth. Analg., March 1, 2001; 92(3): 700 - 709. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Aantaa, R. Takala, and P. Muittari Sevoflurane EC50 and EC95 values for laryngeal mask insertion and tracheal intubation in children Br. J. Anaesth., February 1, 2001; 86(2): 213 - 216. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Niermeyer, W. Carlo, D. Boyle, J. Goldsmith, B. Nightengale, J. Perlman, A. Solimano, M. Speer, and T. Wiswell What Is on the Horizon for Neonatal Resuscitation? NeoReviews, February 1, 2001; 2(2): e51 - 57. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
J. Brimacombe, C. Keller, T. Asai, and K. Shingu Laryngeal Mask Usage in the Unstable Neck • Response Anesth. Analg., August 1, 1999; 89(2): 536 - 536. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. R. Brimacombe, C. Keller, A. R. Gunkel, and F. Puhringer The Influence of the Tonsillar Gag on Efficacy of Seal, Anatomic Position, Airway Patency, and Airway Protection with the Flexible Laryngeal Mask Airway: A Randomized, Cross-Over Study of Fresh Adult Cadavers Anesth. Analg., July 1, 1999; 89(1): 181 - 181. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Casati, G. Fanelli, E. Casaletti, V. Cedrati, F. Veglia, and G. Torri The Target Plasma Concentration of Propofol Required to Place Laryngeal Mask Versus Cuffed Oropharyngeal Airway Anesth. Analg., April 1, 1999; 88(4): 917 - 917. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |