CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Elwood, T.
Right arrow Articles by MacAdams, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Elwood, T.
Right arrow Articles by MacAdams, C.

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol 42, 114-118, Copyright © 1995 by Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society

ARTICLES

Midazolam coinduction does not delay discharge after very brief propofol anaesthesia

T Elwood, S Huchcroft and C MacAdams
Department of Anaesthesia, University of Calgary, Foothills Hospital, Alberta, Canada.

Previous reports have demonstrated synergism of midazolam and propofol for induction of anaesthesia in humans. We tested the hypothesis that in the presence of alfentanil, the combination of midazolam with propofol for a very brief operative procedure would not affect the recovery phase. During pre-oxygenation, 64 outpatients scheduled for dilatation and curettage received placebo, or low-dose midazolam (0.03 mg.kg-1), or high-dose midazolam (0.06 mg.kg-1) iv, in a randomized double-blind manner. They then received alfentanil 10 micrograms.kg-1 iv, followed by titrated doses of propofol iv for induction and maintenance of anaesthesia. Ventilation with 70% N2O in O2 by mask was controlled to achieve a PETCO2 30-40 mmHg. Outcome measures were: propofol dose (induction and maintenance), time until eye-opening to command, and time to discharge-readiness. Propofol induction dose was decreased by increasing doses of midazolam (P = 0.00005). Midazolam delayed time to eye-opening (P = 0.02) but not time to discharge-readiness. This study had an 80% power to detect a 39 min difference in time to discharge-readiness. We conclude that midazolam propofol co-induction in the presence of alfentanil delays eye-opening, but does not delay discharge after anaesthesia.




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1995 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.