CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wood, G. G.
Right arrow Articles by Martin, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wood, G. G.
Right arrow Articles by Martin, E.

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol 42, 186-191, Copyright © 1995 by Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society


ARTICLES

Withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining therapy in a Canadian intensive care unit

GG Wood and E Martin
Department of Anaesthesia, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.

The purpose of this study was to document the rationale and procedures for withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining treatment in critically ill patients. A prospective observational study was conducted over 12 mo in a Canadian academic intensive care unit. Of the 110 intensive care unit patients who died during the study period, 71 (64.5%) died after treatment was withheld or withdrawn. Compared with the other 39 patients who died despite full therapy, these patients were found to have a longer hospital and ICU stay, more organ systems failed, and a higher rate of malignancy. Intensivists rated poor prognosis for survival and poor quality of life should the patient survive as being the two most important factors when making a decision to withhold or withdraw treatment, while patient age and physical health prior to hospital admission were the two least important factors. There was a consistent approach to withdrawing therapy in 68 of the 71 patients who had treatment either withheld or withdrawn. In these 68 patients, the first step was to write a do-not-resuscitate order, vasopressor drugs were then stopped and, lastly, the patient was weaned from mechanical ventilation and the trachea was extubated. The results of this study demonstrate that life-supporting treatment is commonly withdrawn in critically ill patients when continued therapy is thought to be unlikely to restore the patient to health.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CMAJHome page
S. D. Shemie, A. J. Baker, G. Knoll, W. Wall, G. Rocker, D. Howes, J. Davidson, J. Pagliarello, J. Chambers-Evans, S. Cockfield, et al.
National recommendations for donation after cardiocirculatory death in Canada: Donation after cardiocirculatory death in Canada.
Can. Med. Assoc. J., October 10, 2006; 175(8): S1 - S1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
G. M. Rocker, D. J. Cook, and S. D Shemie
Brief review: Practice variation in end of life care in the ICU: implications for patients with severe brain injury: [Revue sommaire de la variation des soins aux mourants dans les USI : implications pour les patients atteints de lesion cerebrale severe].
Can J Anesth, August 1, 2006; 53(8): 814 - 819.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
D. J. Jakobson, L. A. Eidelman, T. M. Worner, A. E. Oppenheim, R. Pizov, and C. L. Sprung
Evaluation of Changes in Forgoing Life-Sustaining Treatment in Israeli ICU Patients
Chest, December 1, 2004; 126(6): 1969 - 1973.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
G. M. Rocker, D. K. Heyland, D. J. Cook, P. M. Dodek, D. J. Kutsogiannis, and C. J. O'Callaghan
Most critically ill patients are perceived to die in comfort during withdrawal of life support: a Canadian multicentre study: [Les grands malades meurent sans souffrance pendant le retrait du maintien des fonctions vitales : une etude canadienne]
Can J Anesth, June 1, 2004; 51(6): 623 - 630.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
D. Garros, R. J. Rosychuk, and P. N. Cox
Circumstances Surrounding End of Life in a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit
Pediatrics, November 1, 2003; 112(5): e371 - 371.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
D. Cook, G. Rocker, J. Marshall, P. Sjokvist, P. Dodek, L. Griffith, A. Freitag, J. Varon, C. Bradley, M. Levy, et al.
Withdrawal of Mechanical Ventilation in Anticipation of Death in the Intensive Care Unit
N. Engl. J. Med., September 18, 2003; 349(12): 1123 - 1132.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
R. I. Hall and G. M. Rocker
End-of-Life Care in the ICU : Treatments Provided When Life Support Was or Was Not Withdrawn
Chest, November 1, 2000; 118(5): 1424 - 1430.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
J. H. Groenewoud, A. van der Heide, J. G. C. Kester, C. L. M. de Graaff, G. van der Wal, and P. J. van der Maas
A Nationwide Study of Decisions to Forego Life-Prolonging Treatment in Dutch Medical Practice
Arch Intern Med, February 14, 2000; 160(3): 357 - 363.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CMAJHome page
D. J. Cook, M. Giacomini, N. Johnson, and D. Willms
Life support in the intensive care unit: a qualitative investigation of technological purposes
Can. Med. Assoc. J., November 1, 1999; 161(9): 1109 - 1113.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
S. A. Mayer and S. B. Kossoff
Withdrawal of life support in the neurological intensive care unit
Neurology, May 1, 1999; 52(8): 1602 - 1602.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1995 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.