CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pinczower, G. R.
Right arrow Articles by Lowmiller, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pinczower, G. R.
Right arrow Articles by Lowmiller, M.

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol 42, 217-220, Copyright © 1995 by Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society


ARTICLES

Bilateral leg pain following lidocaine spinal anaesthesia

GR Pinczower, HS Chadwick, R Woodland and M Lowmiller
Department of Anesthesiology, University of Washington, Seattle 98195, USA.

Spinal anaesthesia is considered to be a safe and effective method of providing anaesthesia for a variety of surgical procedures. Recently, observations have been made that associate the use of hyperbaric lidocaine with bilateral leg pain. We report nine patients who developed strikingly similar neurological symptoms following routine spinal anaesthesia using hyperbaric lidocaine 5% solutions. All patients had their anaesthesia and surgery in the ambulatory or "short stay" care setting. In each patient, moderate to severe, bilateral, posterior, leg pain developed within 24 hr of the anaesthetic administration. The pain was described as either sharp or cramping with or without associated back pain. None of the patients demonstrated objective neurological deficits. In all cases the symptoms resolved fully within one week. The dose of lidocaine administered in these nine patients ranged from 40 to 100 mg. Although the aetiology of the symptoms is not clear the local anaesthetic or its formulation may have been responsible.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
C. Boucher, M. Girard, P. Drolet, Y. Grenier, L. Bergeron, and H. H. Le Truong
Intrathecal fentanyl does not modify the duration of spinal procaine block
Can J Anesth, May 1, 2001; 48(5): 466 - 469.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
H. H. Le Truong, M. Girard, P. Drolet, Y. Grenier, C. Boucher, and L. Bergeron
Spinal anesthesia: a comparison of procaine and lidocaine
Can J Anesth, May 1, 2001; 48(5): 470 - 473.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1995 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.