Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol 42, 391-394, Copyright © 1995 by Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society

ARTICLES

Changing the admission process for elective surgery: an economic analysis

P Boothe and BA Finegan
Department of Economics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.

This study compared the costs of an inpatient elective surgical admission process with an outpatient based same day admission programme in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The effect of this process change on annual surgical volume and case flow (number of procedures performed per surgical bed) in the year before the initiation of same-day method (1989/90) and subsequent to the widespread use of the process (1992/93), was also assessed. Costs incurred by 53 patients who underwent preoperative anaesthetic and surgical assessment as outpatients and were admitted as an outpatient on the day of surgery (SD Group) were compared with those incurred by 11 patients who entered hospital on the day before surgery and underwent anaesthetic and other assessments as inpatients (IP Group). Nursing, radiology, laboratory, operating room, rehabilitation and clinic costs were obtained for each patient. The remaining costs were not amenable to individual attribution and were assigned to each group as a percentage of the allocated costs. The cost per case in the SD Group was $360 less than in the IP Group, reflecting decreased nursing costs incurred by the SD Group. Between the period 1989/90 and 1992/93, the number of surgical beds declined 15.7%; however, surgical volume decreased by only 5.4%. Total case flow improved by 12.2%, that for elective and non-elective surgery increasing by 14.1% and 9.5%, respectively. Elective surgery, where same day admission was used, showed the greatest improvement in case flow. We conclude that a same day admission process reduces cost and serves to enhance hospital productivity.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J A Tan, V N Naik, and L Lingard Exploring obstacles to proper timing of prophylactic antibiotics for surgical site infections Qual. Saf. Health Care, February 1, 2006; 15(1): 32 - 38. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Pradervand Mooser, J.-P. Gardaz, H. Capt, and D. R. Spahn Le cout relatif de l'anesthesie pour la cholecystectomie laparoscopique est peu eleve: [Relative anesthesia-cost for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: fairly low] Can J Anesth, June 1, 2002; 49(6): 540 - 544. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. A. van Klei, K. G.M. Moons, C. L.G. Rutten, A. Schuurhuis, J. T.A. Knape, C. J. Kalkman, and D. E. Grobbee The Effect of Outpatient Preoperative Evaluation of Hospital Inpatients on Cancellation of Surgery and Length of Hospital Stay Anesth. Analg., March 1, 2002; 94(3): 644 - 649. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Matthey, B. T. Finucane, and B. A. Finegan The attitude of the general public towards preoperative assessment and risks associated with general anesthesia Can J Anesth, April 1, 2001; 48(4): 333 - 339. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. B. Pollard and L. Olson Early Outpatient Preoperative Anesthesia Assessment: Does It Help to Reduce Operating Room Cancellations? Anesth. Analg., August 1, 1999; 89(2): 502 - 502. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. P. Fischer Cost-effective Preoperative Evaluation and Testing Chest, May 1, 1999; 115(suppl_2): 96S - 100S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]