CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mikawa, K.
Right arrow Articles by Obara, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mikawa, K.
Right arrow Articles by Obara, H.

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol 42, 730-734, Copyright © 1995 by Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society


ARTICLES

Gastric fluid volume and pH after nizatidine in adults undergoing elective surgery: influence of timing and dose

K Mikawa, K Nishina, N Maekawa, M Asano and H Obara
Department of Anaesthesiology, Kobe University School of Medicine, Japan.

We conducted a prospective, randomized, double-blind study to investigate the effect of oral nizatidine (150-600 mg), a new potent H2 antagonist, on preoperative gastric fluid pH and volume in adults undergoing elective surgery. One hundred and seventy-five healthy adults (21-68 yr) were randomly allocated to seven treatment groups (n = 25); Placebo was administered at 21:00 and 06:30 the night before and on the day of surgery, respectively (0/0: control); nizatidine 150 mg at 21:00 and placebo at 06:30 (150/0); placebo at 21:00 and nizatidine 150 mg at 06:30 (0/150); nizatidine 150 mg at 21:00 and 06:30 (150/150); nizatidine 300 mg at 21:00 and placebo at 06:30 (300/0); placebo at 21:00 and nizatidine 300 mg at 06:30 (0/300); and nizatidine 300 mg at 21:00 and 06:30 (300/300). Each patient fasted overnight and took the drug and/or placebo with 20 ml water. After induction of anaesthesia, the pH and volume of gastric fluid obtained through an orogastric tube were measured. The mean pH of 0/150, 150/150, 300/0, 0/300, and 300/300 groups was higher than that of the control group (P < 0.05). Gastric volume in these groups was smaller than in the control (P < 0.05). The 150/0 group failed to decrease gastric fluid volume and increase pH. In the 300/0 group, the gastric pH was lower than other regimens which effectively decreased gastric acidity (P < 0.05). The number of patients with a pH < 2.5 and a volume > 0.4 ml.kg-1 in the 0/150, 150/150, 0/300, and 300/300 groups (0%) was less than in the control group (16%) (P < 0.05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1995 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.