CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Naguib, M.
Right arrow Articles by Seraj, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Naguib, M.
Right arrow Articles by Seraj, M.

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol 42, 758-764, Copyright © 1995 by Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society


ARTICLES

Midazolam for caudal analgesia in children: comparison with caudal bupivacaine

M Naguib, M el Gammal, YS Elhattab and M Seraj
Department of Anaesthesia and ICU, King Saud University, Faculty of Medicine, King Khalid University Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

In a randomized, double-blind study we have examined the analgesic efficacy of caudal administration of midazolam, bupivacaine, or a mixture of both drugs in 45 children, undergoing inguinal herniotomy. They were allocated randomly into three groups (n = 15 in each) to receive a caudal injection of either 0.25% bupivacaine 1 ml.kg-1 with or without midazolam 50 micrograms.kg-1 or midazolam 50 micrograms.kg-1 with normal saline 1 ml.kg-1. There were no differences in quality of pain relief, postoperative behaviour or analgesic requirements between the midazolam group and the other two groups. Times to first analgesic administration (paracetamol suppositories) were longer (P < 0.001) in the bupivacaine-midazolam group than in the other two groups. Further, the bupivacaine-midazolam group received fewer (P < 0.05) doses of paracetamol than the bupivacaine group. Side effects such as motor weakness, respiratory depression or prolonged sedation were not observed in patients who received caudal epidural midazolam only. We conclude that caudal midazolam in a dose of 50 micrograms.kg-1 provides equivalent analgesia to bupivacaine 0.25%, when administered postoperatively in a volume of 1 ml.kg-1 for children following unilateral inguinal herniotomy.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
P. Kumar, A. Rudra, A. K. Pan, and A. Acharya
Caudal Additives in Pediatrics: A Comparison Among Midazolam, Ketamine, and Neostigmine Coadministered with Bupivacaine
Anesth. Analg., July 1, 2005; 101(1): 69 - 73.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
T. L. Yaksh and J. W. Allen
The Use of Intrathecal Midazolam in Humans: A Case Study of Process
Anesth. Analg., June 1, 2004; 98(6): 1536 - 1545.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
C. K. S. Ong, R. A. Seymour, and J. M.-H. Tan
Sedation with Midazolam Leads to Reduced Pain After Dental Surgery
Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2004; 98(5): 1289 - 1293.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
T. G. Hansen, S. W. Henneberg, S. Walther-Larsen, J. Lund, and M. Hansen
Caudal bupivacaine supplemented with caudal or intravenous clonidine in children undergoing hypospadias repair: a double-blind study
Br. J. Anaesth., February 1, 2004; 92(2): 223 - 227.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
D. A. H. de Beer and M. L. Thomas
Caudal additives in children--solutions or problems?
Br. J. Anaesth., April 1, 2003; 90(4): 487 - 498.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
M. Abdulatif and M. El-Sanabary
Caudal Neostigmine, Bupivacaine, and Their Combination for Postoperative Pain Management After Hypospadias Surgery in Children
Anesth. Analg., November 1, 2002; 95(5): 1215 - 1218.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
K. Fukuda, T. Shoda, H. Mima, and H. Uga
Midazolam Induces Expression of c-Fos and EGR-1 by a Non-GABAergic Mechanism
Anesth. Analg., August 1, 2002; 95(2): 373 - 378.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
R. F. Cox and M. A. Collins
The Effects of Benzodiazepines on Human Opioid Receptor Binding and Function
Anesth. Analg., August 1, 2001; 93(2): 354 - 358.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1995 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.