CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rose, D. K.
Right arrow Articles by Cohen, M. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rose, D. K.
Right arrow Articles by Cohen, M. M.

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol 43, 30-34, Copyright © 1996 by Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society


ARTICLES

The incidence of airway problems depends on the definition used

DK Rose and MM Cohen
Department of Anaesthesia, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada.

PURPOSE: Definitions currently used to describe airway difficulties are confusing, inconsistent, and may be misleading. To understand the "extent of the problem" better using three different definitions we examined the corresponding rates of airway difficulty in 3,325 consecutive adult patients who had direct laryngoscopy with tracheal intubation following induction of general anaesthesia. METHODS: Definitions were (i) poor view at laryngoscopy (GRADE 3-4) documented on modified diagrams of Cormack and Lehane; (ii) > or = 3 laryngoscopy attempts; and (iii) failure of direct laryngoscopy. The incidences of airway difficulty attributable to each definition were compared. RESULTS: For the three definitions rates varied, 10.1% for poor view, 1.9% > or = 3 laryngoscopies, and failure 0.1%. For patients with a GRADE 3-4 view, 15.8% required > or = 3 laryngoscopies, but for those with > or = 3 laryngoscopies, 84.1% had GRADE 3-4 view. All patients with failed laryngoscopy had > or = 3 laryngoscopies and a GRADE 4 view. CONCLUSION: This wide variation in defining the "extent of the problem" emphasizes the need for agreement of definitions and improved methods to document airway difficulties.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
M.-H. Tremblay, S. Williams, A. Robitaille, and P. Drolet
Poor Visualization During Direct Laryngoscopy and High Upper Lip Bite Test Score Are Predictors of Difficult Intubation with the GlideScope(R) Videolaryngoscope
Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2008; 106(5): 1495 - 1500.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Intensive Care MedHome page
T. C. Mort
Complications of Emergency Tracheal Intubation: Hemodynamic Alterations - Part I
J Intensive Care Med, May 1, 2007; 22(3): 157 - 165.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
P. Biro, U. Battig, J. Henderson, and B. Seifert
First clinical experience of tracheal intubation with the SensaScope(R), a novel steerable semirigid video stylet
Br. J. Anaesth., August 1, 2006; 97(2): 255 - 261.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
E. Crosby
The unanticipated difficult airway - evolving strategies for successful salvage/L'intubation difficile imprevue - evolution des strategies d'un sauvetage reussi
Can J Anesth, June 1, 2005; 52(6): 562 - 567.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
C. M. Burkle, M. T. Walsh, B. A. Harrison, T. B. Curry, and S. H. Rose
Airway management after failure to intubate by direct laryngoscopy: outcomes in a large teaching hospital: [Le controle des voies aeriennes apres l'echec de l'intubation par laryngoscopie directe : resultats obtenus dans un grand hopital universitaire]
Can J Anesth, June 1, 2005; 52(6): 634 - 640.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
T. Ezri, B. Medalion, M. Weisenberg, P. Szmuk, R. D. Warters, and I. Charuzi
Increased body mass index per se is not a predictor of difficult laryngoscopy: [Un indice de masse corporelle eleve n'est pas, en soi, un predicteur de laryngoscopie difficile]
Can J Anesth, February 1, 2003; 50(2): 179 - 183.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
S. Fasting and S. E. Gisvold
Serious intraoperative problems - a five-year review of 83,844 anesthetics: [Problemes peroperatoires graves - une revue de 83 844 anesthesies sur cinq ans]
Can J Anesth, June 1, 2002; 49(6): 545 - 553.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
T. Ezri, R. D. Warters, P. Szmuk, H. Saad-Eddin, D. Geva, J. Katz, and C. Hagberg
The Incidence of Class ""Zero"" Airway and the Impact of Mallampati Score, Age, Sex, and Body Mass Index on Prediction of Laryngoscopy Grade
Anesth. Analg., October 1, 2001; 93(4): 1073 - 1075.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
J.-P. Estebe
Prediction of difficult intubation: are we talking about the same thing?
Can J Anesth, July 1, 2001; 48(7): 719 - 720.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
T.M. Cook, R. M. Levitan, E. A. Ochroch, and J. Hollander
POGO Score
Can J Anesth, May 1, 2000; 47(5): 477 - 478.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.