CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hirabayashi, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Shimizu, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hirabayashi, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Shimizu, R.

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol 43, 1072-1075, Copyright © 1996 by Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society


ARTICLES

Failed spinal anaesthesia: cause identified by MRI

Y Hirabayashi, H Fukuda, K Saitoh, S Inoue, H Mitsuhata and R Shimizu
Department of Anesthesiology, Jichi Medical School, Tochigi, Japan.

PURPOSE: To determine the cause of failed spinal anaesthesia, magnetic resonance images of the lumbar spine were examined. CLINICAL FUTURES: A 28-yr-old woman, scheduled for closure of a rectal fistula under spinal anaesthesia, hyperbaric tetracaine 12.5 mg injected into the subarachnoid space at L3-4 repeatedly resulted in restricted sacral spread. Magnetic resonance imaging showed that the cylindrical dimension of the lumbar spinal canal was wider than in normal subjects, suggesting a larger volume of CSF within the dural sac below the termination of the cord. The summit of the lumbar convexity was located at L3, which was more cephalad than the L3-4 puncture site. CONCLUSION: The uncommon anatomical characteristics of the lumbar spinal canal identified by magnetic resonance imaging were considered to be the reason for the restricted sacral spread observed repeatedly in this patient.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
G. Hocking and J. A. W. Wildsmith
Intrathecal drug spread
Br. J. Anaesth., October 1, 2004; 93(4): 568 - 578.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.