CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wong, D. H.
Right arrow Articles by Merrick, P. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wong, D. H.
Right arrow Articles by Merrick, P. M.

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol 43, 1115-1120, Copyright © 1996 by Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society

ARTICLES

Intravenous sedation prior to peribulbar anaesthesia for cataract surgery in elderly patients

DH Wong and PM Merrick
Department of Anaesthesia, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.

PURPOSE: To investigate if pre-block iv sedation using midazolam, alfentanil, or a midazolam-alfentanil combination minimizes pain, reduces pain recall, and attenuates haemodynamic responses to peribulbar block; and to determine other factors influencing oxygen saturation (SpO2) following iv sedation. METHODS: In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 120 patients, mean age 73 yr, having cataract surgery with peribular anaesthesia, were randomized to receive either normal saline, 1 mg midazolam, 500 micrograms alfentanil, or 0.5 mg midazolam plus 250 micrograms alfentanil. Blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR) and pulse oximetry readings were recorded before injection of the study drugs, immediately after completion of the peribulbar block, and 10 min after the block. Pain from the anaesthetic block was assessed immediately after the block and after surgery using a visual analog scale, and recall of pain was assessed by telephone on the day after surgery. RESULTS: Pain scores were low in all four groups. Midazolam-alfentanil reduced pain perception, and all iv sedation used reduced pain recall. Midazolam reduced systolic BP; alfentanil +/- midazolam reduced HR. All iv sedation reduced SpO2 more than did saline, but not usually to a clinically important level. Nine patients had a SpO2 < or = 90%; all had received alfentanil with or without midazolam. It was not possible to predict oxygen saturation levels by any factors other than iv sedation and baseline SpO2 levels. CONCLUSION: Intravenous sedation with midazolam or alfentanil or in combination reduced pain perception, pain recall, and haemodynamic responses from peribulbar anaesthesia. Fifteen percent of patients given alfentanil developed clinically important oxygen desaturation. The use of fine gauge needles combined with slow injection of anaesthetic solution causes minimal discomfort, and routine iv sedation may be unnecessary.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Br J AnaesthHome page
J. A. Alhashemi
Dexmedetomidine vs midazolam for monitored anaesthesia care during cataract surgery
Br. J. Anaesth., June 1, 2006; 96(6): 722 - 726.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.