| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol 43, 1211-1215, Copyright © 1996 by Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society
ARTICLES |
T Kasaba, G Yoshikawa, T Seguchi and M Takasaki
Department of Anesthesiology, Miyazaki Medical College, Japan.
PURPOSE: To determine the extent of enhanced blockade by the combined use of epidural fentanyl and mepivacaine. We compared the onset of hypoalgesia, analgesia and the threshold of pressure pain. METHODS: Thirty patients were randomly divided into three groups. The fentanyl group received 10 ml saline containing 0.1 mg fentanyl, mepivacaine group received 10 ml mepivacaine 1% and a mixed group received 10 ml mepivacaine 1% with 0.1 mg fentanyl. All solutions, without epinephrine, were injected through an epidural catheter at T5-6 to T6-7. The change in sensation, loss of pin-prick and pain threshold sensation, measured by pressure algometer, were assessed at 2.5-min intervals for 15 min at the T4 dermatome. Spread of analgesia was determined at 15 min. RESULTS: Loss of pinprick was more rapid in the mixed, 11.0 +/- 2.7 (SD) min, than in the mepivacaine group, 15.0 +/- 2.9 min, (P < 0.05), although there was no difference in change of sensation. Pressure pain threshold increased with time in the mepivacaine (P < 0.05) and mixed (P < 0.05) groups. It was higher in the mixed than in the fentanyl and mepivacaine groups at 5, 7.5 and 10 min (P < 0.05). The lower level of analgesia was lower in the mixed than in the mepivacaine groups (P < 0.05). Blood pressure was unchanged in the three groups, but heart rate decreased at 7.5, 10, 12.5, and 15 min in the mepivacaine and mixed groups (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The addition of fentanyl to mepivacaine accelerates the onset of analgesia and enhances the analgesic effect of epidural block.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C.-H. Cherng, C.-P. Yang, and C.-S. Wong Epidural Fentanyl Speeds the Onset of Sensory and Motor Blocks During Epidural Ropivacaine Anesthesia Anesth. Analg., December 1, 2005; 101(6): 1834 - 1837. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |