CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fisher, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Volgyesi, G. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fisher, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Volgyesi, G. A.

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol 43, 179-183, Copyright © 1996 by Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society

ARTICLES

Evaluation of a new pulse oximeter testing device

JA Fisher, T Martire and GA Volgyesi
Department of Anaesthesia, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario.

BACKGROUND: Valid routine testing of pulse oximeters and their sensors is problematic. A suitable testing device must not only generate the pulsatile signal the pulse oximeter requires for its operation, but must possess light absorption characteristics similar to those of living tissue. A new device called Pulse Oximeter Tester (POT) has recently become available which, it is claimed, addresses these problems. PURPOSE: To evaluate the POT as a suitable stimulus for pulse oximeters. METHOD: We tested all the pulse oximeters and their sensors with a set of POTs simulating blood oxygen saturation of 80%, 90% and 100%. The tests were performed at simulated heart rates of 30, 75 and 110 bpm. RESULTS: The SpO2 readings (mean +/- SD) obtained with the 80%, 90% and 100% POTs were 80.7 +/- 1.3%, 90.3 +/- 0.9% and 100 +/- 0.0% respectively. There were no significant differences in readings obtained at the different simulated heart rates. Two pulse oximeters gave readings that deviated more than 2 SD from the mean. Their sensors were subsequently found to be defective. CONCLUSION: POTs provide suitable stimuli for testing pulse oximeters. In our study sample they were found to be highly specific, but of unknown sensitivity.




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.