CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vivien, B.
Right arrow Articles by Samii, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vivien, B.
Right arrow Articles by Samii, K.

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol 43, 232-237, Copyright © 1996 by Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society


ARTICLES

Is lidocaine-prilocaine cream (EMLA) always useful for venous puncture in preoperative autologous blood donation?

B Vivien, X Mazoit, J Peynet, S Kim, T Lambert and K Samii
Department of Anaesthesiology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bicetre, Paris, France.

PURPOSE: The goal of the present study was to evaluate in adults the benefit of the Eutectic Mixture of Local Anesthetics (EMLA) for preoperative autologous blood donation. METHODS: Twenty-six adult patients requiring three blood samples were studied. The pain of venipuncture was assessed by the patient using a 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and a four-category Verbal Rating Scale (VRS). The first puncture was performed without anaesthesia, as a "reference puncture". The second and third punctures were performed with EMLA and placebo in a double-blind cross-over randomization. For statistical analysis, the patients were allocated to two groups according to the VAS scores of the reference puncture: (Group 1) VASref < 20 mm; (Group 2) VASref > or = 20 mm. RESULTS: For the whole 26 patients, the VAS and the VRS pain scores were lower for EMLA puncture than for both the placebo and reference punctures (P < 0.05). Twenty patients had a VASref < 20 mm and six patients a VASref > or = 20 mm. In Group 1, there was no difference between EMLA and placebo for both the VAS and VRS scores. In contrast, in Group 2, the VAS score was lower for EMLA than for both the placebo and the reference punctures (respectively 11 +/- 7.1, 28.9 +/- 7.9, 29.1 +/- 6.4; P < 0.01); the VRS score was also lower for EMLA puncture than for placebo puncture (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: In adults requiring repeated venous punctures, pain from cannulation may be evaluated at the first puncture with a Visual Analogue Scale, thus indicating or not the need for EMLA.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.