CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ripart, J.
Right arrow Articles by Girard, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ripart, J.
Right arrow Articles by Girard, M.

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol 43, 368-372, Copyright © 1996 by Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society

ARTICLES

[Effects of different doses of edrophonium antagonism of mivacurium-induced neuromuscular block in the presence of nitrous oxide, propofol, and alfentanil anesthesia]

J Ripart, P Drolet, L Perreault and M Girard
Departement d'anesthesie-reanimation, Universite de Montpellier, France.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the dose-response relationships for edrophonium antagonism of mivacurium-induced neuromuscular block. METHOD: Seventy-five ASA physical status I or II adults were given mivacurium 0.15 mg.kg-1 followed by an infusion (7 micrograms.kg-1.min-1) during alfentanil-propofol-N2O anaesthesia. Train-of-four stimulation (TOF) was applied to the ulnar nerve every 20 sec and the response of the adductor digiti minimi was recorded (Relaxograph NMT-100, DATEX, Helsinki, Finland). Mivacurium infusion was adjusted at five minutes intervals in order to keep the height of the first twitch in TOF (T1) at 5% of its control value. At the end of surgery, the mivacurium infusion was stopped and edrophonium 0.0, 0.05, 0.1, 0.5 or 1.0 mg.kg-1 combined respectively with glycopyrrolate 0.0, 0.0005, 0.001, 0.005 or 0.01 mg.kg-1 were administered by random allocation. RESULTS: All four edrophonium doses tested were statistically different from placebo with regard to time to attain a TOF ratio (fourth twitch in TOF/T1) = 0.7 (0.05:780 +/- 179, 0.1:727 +/- 216, 0.5:547 +/- 287 and 1.0:640 +/- 236 vs 0.0 mg.kg-1:1089 +/- 323 sec P < 0.05). Does of 0.1, 0.5 and 1.0 mg.kg-1 permitted faster recovery time of T1 from 10 to 95% (T10-95) (567 +/- 236, 419 +/- 166, 555 +/- 288 vs 861 +/- 224 sec P < 0.05) and from 25 to 75% (T25-75) (253 +/- 121, 147 +/- 92, 217 +/- 175 vs 429 +/- 154 sec P < 0.05) than did placebo. However, data showed considerable variability for all neuromuscular indices, no matter the dose of edrophonium used. CONCLUSION: Edrophonium in doses of 0.1 mg.kg-1 and higher permitted faster recovery of all indices from a mivacurium-induced block during alfentanil-propofol-N2O anaesthesia than did placebo.




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.