CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ibebunjo, C
Right arrow Articles by Donati, F
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Ibebunjo, C
Right arrow Articles by Donati, F

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol 43, 475-484, Copyright © 1996 by Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society


ARTICLES

Properties of fibres, endplates and acetylcholine receptors in the diaphragm, masseter, laryngeal, abdominal and limb muscles in the goat

C Ibebunjo, CB Srikant and F Donati
Department of Anaesthesia, Royal Victoria Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

PURPOSE: Although differences in fibre composition, fibre size or acetylcholine receptor (AChR) density between muscles have often been proposed to explain the unequal sensitivities of muscles to muscle relaxant drugs, it is not clear whether or how these parameters differ among muscles or are related to one another, In this study, several muscles were examined to determine the composition and cross-sectional area (CSA) of types I and II fibres, the surface area of their motor endplates (ESA), and their AChR density. METHODS: Biopsies from the thyroarytenoideus, cricoarytenoideus dorsalis, masseter, diaphragm, transversus abdominis, rectus abdominis, gastrocnemius and soleus muscles of goats were processed by muscle histochemistry and morphometry and the ESA:CSA ratio was computed. The number and density of AChRs per endplate were estimated by 125I-alpha-bungarotoxin binding studies. RESULTS: The mean type I fibre composition (range: 0-100%), fibre diameter (28-50 microns) and the ESA:CSA ratio (0.27-1.01) differed among muscles (P = 0.0001), but there were no significant differences (P > 0.05) in the mean endplate size (577-725 microns 2) AChR number (6.6-14.5 x 10(6)) or AChR density (8,900-22,300 microns-2) probably because of marked individual variations. Fibre size increased and the ESA:CSA ratio decreased in the order laryngeal, diaphragm, jaw, limb and abdominal muscles. CONCLUSION: It is concluded that between muscles fibre size varies more than endplate size or AChR number.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.