CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Karkouti, K.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Karkouti, K.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, H.

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol 43, 554-559, Copyright © 1996 by Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society


ARTICLES

Inter-observer reliability of ten tests used for predicting difficult tracheal intubation

K Karkouti, DK Rose, LE Ferris, DF Wigglesworth, T Meisami-Fard and H Lee
Department of Anaesthesia, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

PURPOSE: To determine inter-observer reliability of ten preoperative airway assessment tests used for predicting difficult tracheal intubation. METHOD: We prospectively assessed 59 patients undergoing elective surgery requiring tracheal intubation at a large metropolitan teaching hospital. Two experienced observers independently conducted the airway assessment tests on the same group of patients. Inter-observer reliability was examined using Kappa (K) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS: Two tests--mouth opening (ICC = 0.93) and chin protrusion (ICC = 0.89)--had excellent inter-observer reliability. Seven tests--thyromental distance (ICC - 0.74), subluxation (K = 0.66), atlanto-occipital extension distance (ICC = 0.67) and angle (K = 0.66), profile classification (K = 0.58), ramus length (ICC = 0.53), oropharyngeal best view (K = 0.49)--were moderately reliable. One test--Mallampati technique of assessing oropharyngeal view (K = 0.31)--had poor reliability. CONCLUSION: Many of the preoperative airway tests have only moderate inter-observer reliability. This may provide some insight into why previous research has failed to show that the tests accurately predict difficult tracheal intubation.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
A. Lee, L. T. Y. Fan, T. Gin, M. K. Karmakar, and W. D. Ngan Kee
A systematic review (meta-analysis) of the accuracy of the mallampati tests to predict the difficult airway.
Anesth. Analg., June 1, 2006; 102(6): 1867 - 1878.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
L. H. J. Eberhart, C. Arndt, T. Cierpka, J. Schwanekamp, H. Wulf, and C. Putzke
The Reliability and Validity of the Upper Lip Bite Test Compared with the Mallampati Classification to Predict Difficult Laryngoscopy: An External Prospective Evaluation
Anesth. Analg., July 1, 2005; 101(1): 284 - 289.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
C. M. Burkle, M. T. Walsh, B. A. Harrison, T. B. Curry, and S. H. Rose
Airway management after failure to intubate by direct laryngoscopy: outcomes in a large teaching hospital: [Le controle des voies aeriennes apres l'echec de l'intubation par laryngoscopie directe : resultats obtenus dans un grand hopital universitaire]
Can J Anesth, June 1, 2005; 52(6): 634 - 640.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
N. A. Merah, D. T. Wong, D. J. Ffoulkes-Crabbe, O. T. Kushimo, and C. O. Bode
Modified Mallampati test, thyromental distance and inter-incisor gap are the best predictors of difficult laryngoscopy in West Africans: [Le test de Mallampati modifie, la distance thyromentonniere et l'espace entre les incisives sont les meilleurs predicteurs de difficultes laryngoscopiques chez des Africains de l'Ouest]
Can J Anesth, March 1, 2005; 52(3): 291 - 296.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
R. M. Cooper, J. A. Pacey, M. J. Bishop, and S. A. McCluskey
Early clinical experience with a new videolaryngoscope (GlideScope(R)) in 728 patients: [Experience clinique preliminaire avec un nouveau videolaryngoscope (GlideScope(R)) chez 728 patients]
Can J Anesth, February 1, 2005; 52(2): 191 - 198.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
B. Fang, J. Norris, V. K. Grover, R. Mahajan, T. Ezri, P. Szmuk, Y. Cohen, and R. D. Warters
Class Zero Airway and Laryngoscopy * Response * Response
Anesth. Analg., March 1, 2004; 98(3): 870 - 871.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
T. Ezri, B. Medalion, M. Weisenberg, P. Szmuk, R. D. Warters, and I. Charuzi
Increased body mass index per se is not a predictor of difficult laryngoscopy: [Un indice de masse corporelle eleve n'est pas, en soi, un predicteur de laryngoscopie difficile]
Can J Anesth, February 1, 2003; 50(2): 179 - 183.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
Z. H. Khan, A. Kashfi, and E. Ebrahimkhani
A Comparison of the Upper Lip Bite Test (a Simple New Technique) with Modified Mallampati Classification in Predicting Difficulty in Endotracheal Intubation: A Prospective Blinded Study
Anesth. Analg., February 1, 2003; 96(2): 595 - 599.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
T. Heidegger, H. J. Gerig, B. Ulrich, and G. Kreienbuhl
Validation of a Simple Algorithm for Tracheal Intubation: Daily Practice Is the Key to Success in Emergencies-- An Analysis of 13,248 Intubations
Anesth. Analg., February 1, 2001; 92(2): 517 - 522.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
S. A. Grant, K. Millar, and G. N. C. Kenny
Blood alcohol concentration and psychomotor effects
Br. J. Anaesth., September 1, 2000; 85(3): 401 - 406.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
K. Karkouti, D. K. Rose, D. Wigglesworth, and M. M. Cohen
Predicting difficult intubation: a multivariable analysis
Can J Anesth, August 1, 2000; 47(8): 730 - 739.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.