| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol 44, 14-18, Copyright © 1997 by Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society
ARTICLES |
JS Bender, SH Halpern, M Thangaroopan, AR Jadad and A Ohlsson
Department of Anaesthesia, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
PURPOSE: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are suitable for meta-analysis and systematic reviews provided they are of high quality and are easy to retrieve. We determined these attributes of RCTs in obstetrical anaesthesia in a sample of available journals that are indexed in MEDLINE. SOURCE: Randomized controlled trials published between January 1985 and December 1994 in seven anaesthetic and three obstetric journals were identified by a MEDLINE search, and by handsearch of the same journals. Each RCT was assigned a quality score by a blinded rater using a reliable and validated scaled. The quality of each RCT was described and compared over time and by journal. The comparative yield of MEDLINE and hand-search was evaluated. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Three hundred and forty RCTs were retrieved by MEDLINE and handsearch. Two hundred and twenty seven (65%) were identified by the MEDLINE search and 333 by the handsearch (98%). The median quality score was 3/5. There was no difference in score over time. Anesthesiology had the highest median score, Anaesthesia had the lowest (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Care must be taken when reviewing obstetrical anaesthesia research. Strategies in addition to a MEDLINE search must be used to identify RCTs since more than one third were missed using MEDLINE alone. Poor quality RCTs are more likely to be biased in favour of a new treatment. Therefore, to increase the validity of reviews sensitivity analyses based on quality should be done.
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  S. A. Olivo, L. G. Macedo, I. C. Gadotti, J. Fuentes, T. Stanton, and D. J Magee Scales to Assess the Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials: A Systematic Review Physical Therapy, February 1, 2008; 88(2): 156 - 175. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. T.-L. Choi, S. E. Galinski, S. Lucas, L. Takeuchi, and A. R. Jadad Examining the evidence in anesthesia literature: a survey and evaluation of obstetrical postdural puncture headache reports : [Examen de la preuve dans la documentation sur l'anesthesie : enquete et evaluation des articles sur les cephalees obstetricales post-ponction durale] Can J Anesth, January 1, 2002; 49(1): 49 - 56. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. D. Brooks, H. M. Karpoff, I. Sulimanoff, D. Coit, M. F. Brennan, and D. P. Jaques The Search for Level I Evidence in Solid-Tumor Oncology Ann. Surg. Oncol., September 1, 2001; 8(8): 638 - 643. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. T-L. Choi, S. H. Halpern, N. Malik, A. R. Jadad, M. R. Tramer, and B. Walder Examining the Evidence in Anesthesia Literature: A Critical Appraisal of Systematic Reviews Anesth. Analg., March 1, 2001; 92(3): 700 - 709. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. R. Jadad and D. Rennie The Randomized Controlled Trial Gets a Middle-aged Checkup JAMA, January 28, 1998; 279(4): 319 - 320. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
