CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tessler, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Huberman, M. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tessler, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Huberman, M. M.

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol 44, 1036-1041, Copyright © 1997 by Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society

ARTICLES

A "zero tolerance for overtime" increases surgical per case costs

MJ Tessler, SJ Kleiman and MM Huberman
Department of Anaesthesia, SMBD-Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec.

PURPOSE: One technique which some hospitals have used in an attempt to control Operating Room costs is a "zero tolerance for overtime" policy. We used a case cost analysis to determine if this policy was always cost effective. METHOD: A case cost analysis was designed based on a "test case" which would start late in the day. The case would last for three hours of which 1 1/2 hr would be during regular hours, and 1 1/2 hr would incur overtime. Costs were analysed using a "patient pays," "society pays," and "hospital pays" analysis. Costs were based on figures determined from the SMBD-Jewish General Hospital budget, Quebec Health Insurance fees, and Government of Canada statistics. RESULTS: Regardless of who pays, in this case scenario it was more cost effective to proceed than to postpone surgery. Costs of proceeding with the surgery in the "patient pays," "society pays," and "hospital pays" models were $1,832.00, $1,227.40, and $1,215.00 respectively. The costs of postponing the surgery in the same three models were $1,937.00, $1,336.80, and $1,436.00. CONCLUSION: A "zero tolerance for overtime" policy may be too rigid to be consistently cost effective.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Anesth. Analg.Home page
F. Dexter, A. Willemsen-Dunlap, and J. D. Lee
Operating Room Managerial Decision-Making on the Day of Surgery With and Without Computer Recommendations and Status Displays
Anesth. Analg., August 1, 2007; 105(2): 419 - 429.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Anesth. Analg.Home page
C. McIntosh, F. Dexter, and R. H. Epstein
The Impact of Service-Specific Staffing, Case Scheduling, Turnovers, and First-Case Starts on Anesthesia Group and Operating Room Productivity: A Tutorial Using Data from an Australian Hospital
Anesth. Analg., December 1, 2006; 103(6): 1499 - 1516.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Anesth. Analg.Home page
F. Dexter, A. E. Abouleish, R. H. Epstein, C. W. Whitten, and D. A. Lubarsky
Use of Operating Room Information System Data to Predict the Impact of Reducing Turnover Times on Staffing Costs
Anesth. Analg., October 1, 2003; 97(4): 1119 - 1126.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Anesth. Analg.Home page
F. Dexter, R. D. Traub, and P. Lebowitz
Scheduling A Delay Between Different Surgeons' Cases in the Same Operating Room on the Same Day Using Upper Prediction Bounds for Case Durations
Anesth. Analg., April 1, 2001; 92(4): 943 - 946.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1997 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.