CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hirota, K.
Right arrow Articles by Matsuki, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hirota, K.
Right arrow Articles by Matsuki, A.

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol 44, 1115-1119, Copyright © 1997 by Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society


ARTICLES

Midazolam reverses histamine-induced bronchoconstriction in dogs

K Hirota, N Ohtomo, Y Hashimoto, T Kudo, H Ishihara and A Matsuki
Department of Anesthesiology, University of Hirosaki School of Medicine, Japan.

PURPOSE: Midazolam has been used clinically as a sedative and as an anaesthetic induction agent. However, the bronchodilating effects of midazolam have not been comprehensively evaluated. We sought to determine relaxant effects of midazolam on the airway. METHODS: After our Animal Care Committee approved the study, eight mongrel dogs were anaesthetized with 30 mg.kg-1 pentobarbitone iv, and were paralysed with 200 micrograms.kg-1.hr-1 pancuronium. The trachea was intubated with an endotracheal tube (ID 7 mm) that had a second lumen for insertion of a superfine fibreoptic bronchoscope (OD 2.2 mm) to measure the bronchial cross-sectional area (BCA) continuously. The tip of the bronchoscope was placed at the level of the second or third bronchial bifurcation of the right bronchus. A videoprinter printed the BCA which was then measured with a NIH image program. Bronchoconstriction was produced with histamine (H) 10 micrograms.kg-1 followed by 500 micrograms.kg-1.hr-1. Thirty minutes later, 0 [saline], 0.01, 0.1 and 1.0 mg.kg-1 midazolam and 25 micrograms.kg-1 flumazenil were given. The BCA was assessed before (basal area) and 30 min after the start of H infusion, and was also measured five minutes after each midazolam and flumazenil iv. At the same time, arterial blood was sampled for plasma catecholamine measurement. RESULTS: Histamine infusion decreased BCA to 49.7 +/- 17.3% of basal BCA. More than 0.1 mg.kg-1 midazolam increased BCA up to 71.7 +/- 15.3% of the basal (1.0 mg.kg-1) (P < 0.01). Plasma adrenaline concentration was decreased from 6.9 +/- 3.8 to 3.7 +/- 1.9 ng.ml-1 by 1.0 mg.kg-1 midazolam (P < 0.05). Flumazenil did not antagonize the relaxant effect of midazolam but reversed the inhibitory effect of midazolam on histamine-induced adrenaline release. CONCLUSION: Midazolam has a spasmolytic effect on constricted airways but this bronchodilatation was not reversed by flumazenil.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1997 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.