| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol 44, 1138-1143, Copyright © 1997 by Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society
ARTICLES |
S Schiere, L van den Broek, JH Proost, B Molenbuur and JM Wierda
Research Group for Experimental Anesthesiology and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Groningen, The Netherlands.
PURPOSE: To compare the pharmacodynamic behaviour of vecuronium with that of ORG 9487, we measured the time-course of action of equipotent doses of ORG 9487 and vecuronium and investigated their mutual interaction when given in succession. METHODS: Sixty ASA I-II patients were anaesthetized with thiopentone, fentanyl, halothane and nitrous oxide and assigned randomly to four groups. Each patient received an initial dose (ID) of either vecuronium (V) or ORG 9487 (O) followed by maintenance doses (MDn) of either V or O (ID/MD: O/O, V/O, O/V, and V/V). The time course of action was measured mechanomyographically, determining the duration until 25% recovery of the single twitch (DUR25). RESULTS: The onset time of an ID of ORG 9487 was shorter than that of an ID of vecuronium (96 vs 203 sec, P < 0.001). The DUR25 of the ID of ORG 9487 was less than half that of vecuronium (10.7 +/- 2.8 vs 28.8 +/- 6.1 min, P < 0.001). The DUR25 of MD1 and MD2 of ORG 9487 were shorter than those of vecuronium (O/O: 7.3 +/- 2.8 and 8.5 +/- 2.4 min; V/O: 12.7 +/- 3.3 and 11.5 +/- 3.5 min, vs O/V: 16.4 +/- 4.5 and 20.6 +/- 4.7 min; V/V: 18.8 +/- 3.0 and 20.1 +/- 3.8 min, respectively, P < 0.05). AN ID of vecuronium prolonged the DUR25 of MD1 and MD2 of ORG 9487 (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: ORG 9487 is a muscle relaxant with a shorter duration of action than vecuronium. Maintenance doses of ORG 9487 are also shorter acting than roughly equipotent maintenance doses of vecuronium, irrespective of which relaxant is given initially.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. W. Moore and J. M. Hunter The new neuromuscular blocking agents: do they offer any advantages? Br. J. Anaesth., December 1, 2001; 87(6): 912 - 925. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. E. Larijani, F. Donati, G. Bikhazi, R. Bartkowski, C. A. Kenaan, B. Plaud, and M. E. Goldberg A Multicenter Evaluation of the Time-Course of Action of Two Doses of Rapacuronium After Early and Late Reversal with Neostigmine Anesth. Analg., August 1, 2001; 93(2): 370 - 374. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. E. Kern, R. J. Fragen, P. C. Fitzgerald, M. van Zeeland, and J. O. Johnson Impact of the initial doses of rocuronium and pancuronium on subsequent maintenance for neuromuscular block Can J Anesth, February 1, 2001; 48(2): 129 - 132. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Schiere, J. H. Proost, M. Schuringa, and J. M. K. H. Wierda Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacokinetic-Dynamic Relationship Between Rapacuronium (Org 9487) and Its 3-Desacetyl Metabolite (Org 9488) Anesth. Analg., March 1, 1999; 88(3): 640 - 640. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |