CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bandla, H. P.
Right arrow Articles by Kiernan, M. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bandla, H. P.
Right arrow Articles by Kiernan, M. P.

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol 44, 1242-1247, Copyright © 1997 by Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society


ARTICLES

Laryngeal mask airway facilitated fibreoptic bronchoscopy in infants

HP Bandla, DE Smith and MP Kiernan
Department of Anesthesiology, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA.

PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy of the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) for fibreoptic bronchoscopy (FOB) and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) in infants. METHODS: Observations were made in 19 consecutive infants undergoing FOB under general anaesthesia (GA) plus topical local anaesthesia. Anaesthesia was induced with N2O, O2, and halothane or sevoflurane except in two patients who received propofol and one who received thiopentone. Anaesthesia was maintained with oxygen and either sevoflurane, halothane, desflurane, or propofol infusion. No neuromuscular blockers were used. Size #1 or #2 LMAs were used through which a 3.5 mm fibreoptic bronchoscope was introduced. ECG, noninvasive blood pressure, pulse oximetry and, PETCO2 were measured. Intra- and post-procedural complications were recorded. RESULTS: Mean age was 6 months; mean weight was 6.6 kg. Chronic wheezing was the indication for FOB in eight patients. Minor complications occurred in five patients: difficult LMA placement in one patient required changing size from #2 to #1; two patients had laryngospasm and bronchospasm that resolved with deepened anaesthesia and nebulised bronchodilator; one patient had transient arterial O2 desaturation, responding to increased FIO2, and one patient required tracheal intubation because ventilation via LMA became inadequate. CONCLUSION: The minor complications observed were similar to other series and did not result in morbidity or mortality. We feel that GA via LMA facilitates safe FOB in infants. It affords excellent airway management, a quiet patient, and passage of a large fibreoptic bronchoscope for better imaging and suction channel required for BAL.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1997 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.