CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nikkola, E. M.
Right arrow Articles by Salonen, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nikkola, E. M.
Right arrow Articles by Salonen, M. A.

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol 44, 1248-1255, Copyright © 1997 by Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society


ARTICLES

Intravenous fentanyl PCA during labour

EM Nikkola, UU Ekblad, PO Kero, JJ Alihanka and MA Salonen
Department of Anesthesiology, Turku University Hospital, Finland.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the usefulness of intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) fentanyl for labour analgesia, its effectiveness for maternal pain and safety for the fetus and newborn. METHODS: Twenty primigravidas were randomised to receive intravenous PCA fentanyl or epidural analgesia for labour pain. Maternal pain, heart rate and arterial oxyhaemoglobin saturation (SpO2) were monitored. Fetal and neonatal monitoring included cardiotocogram (CTG), APGAR, neurological scoring and static-charge-sensitive bed (SCSB) recording for 12 hr postnatally with ECG and SpO2. Fentanyl concentrations and pH of umbilical artery and vein were analysed. RESULTS: Initially, epidural analgesia was more effective (P = 0.01), and three patients in the fentanyl group were given epidural due to unsatisfactory pain relief. Overall satisfaction for analgesia did not differ between the groups. Maternal side-effects were more frequent in the fentanyl group (dizziness and tiredness most often, P = 0.0001). Severe side-effects were not reported. In CTG there were no differences between groups. All the newborns were healthy, APGAR and pH were normal. Naloxone was not used. Neurological scoring was similar in both groups. In 12 hr monitoring heart rate, breathing frequency and movement time were similar in both groups, but SpO2 was lower in the fentanyl group (P < 0.001). Umbilical cord fentanyl concentrations were low or beyond the detection limit. CONCLUSION: Intravenous fentanyl can be used for labour analgesia with the doses reported here as an alternative to epidural analgesia. However, the fetus and neonate must be appropriately monitored. Naloxone and oxygen should be available if neonatal distress occurs.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Contin Educ Anaesth Crit Care PainHome page
C. Fortescue and M. Y. Wee
Analgesia in labour: non-regional techniques
CEACCP, February 1, 2005; 5(1): 9 - 13.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
S. H. Halpern, H. Muir, T. W. Breen, D. C. Campbell, J. Barrett, R. Liston, and J. W. Blanchard
A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Patient-Controlled Epidural with Intravenous Analgesia for Pain Relief in Labor
Anesth. Analg., November 1, 2004; 99(5): 1532 - 1538.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
E H C Liu and A T H Sia
Rates of caesarean section and instrumental vaginal delivery in nulliparous women after low concentration epidural infusions or opioid analgesia: systematic review
BMJ, June 12, 2004; 328(7453): 1410.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
C. Castro, U. Tharmaratnam, N. Brockhurst, L. Tureanu, K. Tam, and R. Windrim
Patient-controlled analgesia with fentanyl provides effective analgesia for second trimester labour: a randomized controlled study: [L'analgesie auto-controlee avec du fentanyl est efficace pendant le travail obstetrical du second trimestre : une etude randomisee et controlee]
Can J Anesth, December 1, 2003; 50(10): 1039 - 1046.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
T. A. Saunders and P. S.A. Glass
A Trial of Labor For Remifentanil
Anesth. Analg., April 1, 2002; 94(4): 771 - 773.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
S. Dhileepan, R. G. W. Stacey, J. D. Reynolds, J. V. Booth, and A. J. Olufolabi
A Preliminary Investigation of Remifentanil as a Labor Analgesic
Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2001; 92(5): 1358 - 1359.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
F. Roelants, E. De Franceschi, F. Veyckemans, and P. Lavand'homme
Patient-controlled intravenous analgesia using remifentanil in the parturient
Can J Anesth, February 1, 2001; 48(2): 175 - 178.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
P. K. Morley-Forster, D. W. Reid, and H. Vandeberghe
A comparison of patient-controlled analgesia fentanyl and alfentanil for labour analgesia
Can J Anesth, February 1, 2000; 47(2): 113 - 119.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
S. H. Halpern, B. L. Leighton, A. Ohlsson, J. F. R. Barrett, and A. Rice
Effect of Epidural vs Parenteral Opioid Analgesia on the Progress of Labor: A Meta-analysis
JAMA, December 23, 1998; 280(24): 2105 - 2110.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1997 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.