CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shearer, W.
Right arrow Articles by Michaels, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shearer, W.
Right arrow Articles by Michaels, M.

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol 44, 1311-1314, Copyright © 1997 by Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society


ARTICLES

A model of community based, preadmission management for elective surgical patients

W Shearer, J Monagle and M Michaels
Department of Anaesthesia, Dandenong Hospital, Victoria, Australia.

PURPOSE: This paper outlines the process of preadmission elective surgical preparation utilised at our institution. METHODS: The process commences with a health status questionnaire sent to all patients. Based on the results of the questionnaire all elective surgical patients are then triaged: (i) to be assessed by an appropriately accredited general practitioner (45% of elective surgical patients) and subsequently attend preadmission clinic; (ii) to be seen by an anaesthetist (25%) and also be preadmitted at this visit or (iii) to go directly to preadmission clinic (30%). RESULTS: This has resulted in a 96% same day admission rate for all elective surgery. Cancellations due to suboptimally prepared patients are < 1%. The involvement of general practitioners in this process has reduced patient inconvenience. There has been marked improvement in the ability to admit patients on the same day of surgery for all types of surgery while minimising late cancellations. This has been achieved at a minimum real cost. CONCLUSION: Preanaesthetic assessment is important for patient well-being and hospital throughout. We describe a system for utilising non-anaesthetist general practitioners in this process. Their familiarity with their own patients and appropriate training in preoperative assessment significantly contributes to the efficiency of our elective surgical throughput.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
J. B. Pollard and L. Olson
Early Outpatient Preoperative Anesthesia Assessment: Does It Help to Reduce Operating Room Cancellations?
Anesth. Analg., August 1, 1999; 89(2): 502 - 502.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1997 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.