CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Alhashemi, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Hull, K. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Alhashemi, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Hull, K. A.

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol 44, 118-125, Copyright © 1997 by Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society


ARTICLES

Cost-effectiveness of inhalational, balanced and total intravenous anaesthesia for ambulatory knee surgery

JA Alhashemi, DR Miller, HV O'Brien and KA Hull
Department of Anaesthesia, Ottawa General Hospital, Ontario.

PURPOSE: A randomized, blinded clinical trial was undertaken to compare recovery characteristics and cost-benefits associated with three general anaesthetic techniques for arthroscopic knee surgery in an ambulatory care setting. METHODS: Ninety three, ASA Physical Status I-II patients were randomly allocated to receive one of three types of general anaesthesia: isoflurane/fentanyl/N2O (Group INH); alfentanil/N2O (Group BAL); or propofol/alfentanil/O2 (Group TIVA). Postoperative recovery profiles were evaluated at 30, 60, 90 and 120 min after emergence from anaesthesia, and direct and indirect costs of each anaesthetic were compared. RESULTS: The most rapid emergence was observed in Group BAL (2.2 +/- 1.5 min, P < 0.0001 compared with groups INH and TIVA), although the incidence of post-operative nausea and vomiting was also highest in this group (P = 0.02 compared with groups INH and TIVA). However, overall patient satisfaction, and mean times to discharge from the Post Anesthesia Recovery Unit and hospital, were rapid and similar in all three groups. During anaesthesia which lasted 40-45 min, nearly a four-fold difference was observed in the direct costs of anaesthetic drugs: $16.4 +/- 4.4 (Group INH), $45.3 +/- 11.4 (Group BAL) and $63.4 +/- 17.9 (Group TIVA, P < 0.001 between groups); while indirect costs were similar. CONCLUSIONS: For arthroscopic knee surgery, INH anaesthesia with isoflurane/fentanyl/N2O is associated with similar hospital discharge times, and comparable levels of patient satisfaction as either BAL or TIVA. While indirect costs were similar, lower direct costs suggest that there may be a pharmacoeconomic benefit associated with the use of a "standard" isoflurane/fentanyl/N2O anaesthetic in certain day care surgery procedures.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
J. A. Alhashemi and A. M. Kaki
Dexmedetomidine in combination with morphine PCA provides superior analgesia for shockwave lithotripsy: [La dexmedetomidine combinee a la morphine en AAC fournit une analgesie superieure pour la lithotripsie par ondes de choc]
Can J Anesth, April 1, 2004; 51(4): 342 - 347.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
A. Gupta, T. Stierer, R. Zuckerman, N. Sakima, S. D. Parker, and L. A. Fleisher
Comparison of Recovery Profile After Ambulatory Anesthesia with Propofol, Isoflurane, Sevoflurane and Desflurane: A Systematic Review
Anesth. Analg., March 1, 2004; 98(3): 632 - 641.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
T. Jackson and P. S. Myles
Part II: Total Episode Costs in a Randomized, Controlled Trial of the Effectiveness of Four Anesthetics
Anesth. Analg., October 1, 2000; 91(5): 1170 - 1175.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
S. Suttner, J. Boldt, C. Schmidt, S. Piper, and B. Kumle
Cost Analysis of Target-Controlled Infusion-Based Anesthesia Compared with Standard Anesthesia Regimens
Anesth. Analg., January 1, 1999; 88(1): 77 - 82.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
P. S. Myles, J. O. Hunt, C. E. Nightingale, H. Fletcher, T. Beh, D. Tanil, A. Nagy, A. Rubinstein, and J. L. Ponsford
Development and Psychometric Testing of a Quality of Recovery Score After General Anesthesia and Surgery in Adults
Anesth. Analg., January 1, 1999; 88(1): 83 - 90.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1997 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.