CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Aye, T.
Right arrow Articles by Ballantyne, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Aye, T.
Right arrow Articles by Ballantyne, M.

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol 44, 126-130, Copyright © 1997 by Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society

ARTICLES

Cardiac output estimation by visual inspection vs thermodilution during cardiac surgery

T Aye, B Milne and M Ballantyne
Department of Anaesthesia, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario.

PURPOSE: The objectives of this study were: 1) to compare the estimated cardiac output (CO) by visual inspection with objective measurements by thermodilution: 2) to compare the estimated systemic vascular resistance (SVR) with objective measurements by thermodilution; and 3) to assess whether management of the patient, based on subjective values, would have differed from the management of the patient based on the objective values. METHODS: A non-randomized, prospective, blinded study was conducted at a tertiary care university hospital. Following institutional ethics approval, 35 patients undergoing cardiac surgery, with pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) monitoring, were studied. Prior to the measurement of CO by thermodilution, but after separation from cardiac pulmonary bypass, the CO and SVR were estimated by the anaesthetist and the surgeon. Bland and Altman's method was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Surgeons' estimates of CO were comparable with the objectively measured thermodilution measures: in each case (100%), the difference between the subjective estimate and the objective measurement was less than two standard deviations from the mean difference of the two methods. Anaesthetists' estimates, by visual inspection, were also comparable with the objectively measured thermodilution values; 94.6% of cases. The surgeons' and anaesthetists' estimates of SVR were also comparable with the thermodilution measures in all cases. Management based on subjective values would have differed from those based on objective values in only 8.6% of cases. CONCLUSION: An advantage of cardiac surgery is the ability to observe the heart and assess its performance visually. This study demonstrated that estimates of CO and SVR by clinical observation are comparable with the pulmonary artery catheter's derived values.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Anesth. Analg.Home page
S. Mantha, M. F. Roizen, L. A. Fleisher, R. Thisted, and J. Foss
Comparing Methods of Clinical Measurement: Reporting Standards for Bland and Altman Analysis
Anesth. Analg., March 1, 2000; 90(3): 593 - 602.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1997 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.