CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bijaoui, E.
Right arrow Articles by Baconnier, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bijaoui, E.
Right arrow Articles by Baconnier, P.

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol 44, 216-224, Copyright © 1997 by Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society


ARTICLES

[Correction to the airflow measurement in the presence of a leak between the trachea and endotracheal tube]

E Bijaoui, PY Carry, A Eberhard, P Andrini, JP Perdrix and P Baconnier
Faculte de Medecine, Universite J Fourier Grenoble I, France.

PURPOSE: To estimate the leak between the endotracheal tube and the trachea in newborns in order to compensate for errors in airflow measurement and to monitor mechanical variables from pressure and flow signals. METHODS: Assuming that the leak resistance (Rf) is constant during a respiratory cycle, the resistive properties of the endotracheal tube were evaluated. The method was validated in the intensive care unit with a mechanical test lung and assessed on recordings of three newborns during mechanical ventilation for RDS. We have used a least squares method for the estimation of positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) on both newborns and simulated data. RESULTS: Direct measurements of simulated leak resistances on the mechanical lung are in agreement with our estimation of leak resistances. In newborns, the success of flow correction is evidenced on end inspiratory pauses: corrected flow drops to zero while raw data show a constant nonzero flow. On the simulated lung, the PEEP underestimation with uncorrected flow ranges from 10 to 20 cm H20 while the corresponding, underestimation with corrected flow is less than 2 cm H2O. In newborns, the flow correction shifts the estimated PEEP from negative values (-0.3 +/- 1.3 cm H2O before correction) to positive values (3.6 +/- 0.7 cm H2O after correction) higher than the imposed PEEP (2 cm H2O). CONCLUSIONS: The efficiency of this simple method has been demonstrated. It could be used successfully on adult patients, as there will not be flow correction in the absence of leaks.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1997 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.