CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Badner, N. H.
Right arrow Articles by Craen, R. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Badner, N. H.
Right arrow Articles by Craen, R. A.

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol 44, 255-258, Copyright © 1997 by Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society

ARTICLES

Patient attitudes regarding pca and associated costs

NH Badner, WE Komar and RA Craen
Department of Anaesthesia, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada. nbadner@julian.uwo.ca

PURPOSE: To determine patients' knowledge and attitudes towards patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) costs through the use of our acute pain service quality assurance (QA) programme. METHODS: Quality Assurance questionnaires were distributed to all patients receiving PCA opioids for > 12 hr. Patients were asked to note the presence of side effects (nausea/vomiting, pruritus, urinary retention), to indicate their satisfaction with regard to their pain relief, follow-up assessments, treatment of side effects, and to recall the previous method of pain relief and their satisfaction with it. Patients were also asked to estimate the total cost of PCA (0-$50, $50-100, $100-200, > $200), and what amount if any they would be willing to pay (0-$50, $50-100, $100-200, > $200). Results obtained over a recent four month period were reviewed. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-three questionnaires were distributed and 103 (77%) were returned. The percentage of patients rating their satisfaction as very good or excellent was 86% for pain relief, 96% for follow-up, 71% for side effect treatment, but only 43% for their previous surgical pain relief (P < 0.001). The distribution of cost estimates was 10% $50-100, 37% $100-200 and 53% > $200 with 60% willing to pay a portion of this cost. Those willing to pay were more likely to have had very good or excellent pain relief (94% vs 71%, P < 0.05) and treatment of side effects (71% vs 48%, P < 0.05) than those not willing to pay. CONCLUSIONS: Patients continue to be highly satisfied with PCA therapy and are aware of the costs involved. A majority of patients were willing to pay to obtain this service if necessary. Patients who had poorer pain relief and less efficacious treatment of their side effects were less willing to pay.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Anesth. Analg.Home page
M. U. Werner, L. Soholm, P. Rotboll-Nielsen, and H. Kehlet
Does an Acute Pain Service Improve Postoperative Outcome?
Anesth. Analg., November 1, 2002; 95(5): 1361 - 1372.
[Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1997 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.