CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Williams, R. K.
Right arrow Articles by Abajian, J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Williams, R. K.
Right arrow Articles by Abajian, J. C.

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol 44, 511-514, Copyright © 1997 by Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society

ARTICLES

Combined spinal and epidural anaesthesia for major abdominal surgery in infants

RK Williams, WJ McBride and JC Abajian
Department of Anesthesiology, University of Vermont, College of Medicine, Burlington 05401, USA.

PURPOSE: Subarachnoid anaesthesia is becoming increasingly popular in neonates and infants. However, single dose spinal anaesthesia is of limited value for major abdominal surgery in infants due to its short duration of action and inability to provide analgesia in the post operative period. A new technique of combined spinal and epidural anaesthesia for major abdominal surgery in the infant is described. METHODS: Data were gathered prospectively from 19 infants presenting for upper and lower abdominal surgery. Anaesthesia was induced with a subarachnoid injection of tetracaine. After the subarachnoid block was established, an epidural catheter was placed for further intraoperative and postoperative management. Data collected included age and weight of the patients, type and duration of the surgical procedure. Doses of local anaesthetics as well as the need for intraoperative and postoperative supplements were recorded. An illustrative case report is provided. RESULTS: Infants studied represented a wide range of weights (1520-7840 g). Spinal anaesthesia was successful in all 19 patients. A variety of extensive surgical procedures including small bowel resections and various genitourinary procedures were successfully performed. In 17 patients a functioning epidural catheter was in place postoperatively. In these patients effective analgesia was maintained with dilute solutions of epidural bupivacaine. Only three doses of narcotic were required for pain control. No patient required postoperative mechanical ventilation or tracheal intubation. CONCLUSION: Combined spinal and epidural anaesthesia is a potential option to general anaesthesia for major abdominal surgery in infants.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Anesth. Analg.Home page
R. K. Williams, J. C. Abajian, and D. C. Adams
The Safety and Efficacy of Spinal Anesthesia for Surgery in Infants
Anesth. Analg., March 1, 2007; 104(3): 745 - 745.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Anesth. Analg.Home page
R. K. Williams, D. C. Adams, E. V. Aladjem, J. M. Kreutz, K. H. Sartorelli, D. W. Vane, and J. C. Abajian
The Safety and Efficacy of Spinal Anesthesia for Surgery in Infants: The Vermont Infant Spinal Registry
Anesth. Analg., January 1, 2006; 102(1): 67 - 71.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Anesth. Analg.Home page
G. Cucchiaro, P. De Lagausie, A. El-Ghonemi, and Y. Nivoche
Single-Dose Caudal Anesthesia for Major Intraabdominal Operations in High-Risk Infants
Anesth. Analg., June 1, 2001; 92(6): 1439 - 1441.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
R. K. Williams, J. C. Abajian, and J. D. Tobias
Apnea after spinal anesthesia
Can J Anesth, April 1, 2000; 47(4): 380 - 380.
[Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1997 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.