CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cleland, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Crosby, E. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cleland, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Crosby, E. T.

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol 44, 751-756, Copyright © 1997 by Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society

ARTICLES

Electrocardiographic "pacemaker pseudo-spikes" and radio frequency interference

MJ Cleland and ET Crosby
Biomedical Engineering Department, Ottawa General Hospital, Ontario, Canada.

PURPOSE: To present a case of apparent interference of an ECG monitor by radiofrequency interference (RFI) and to provide a brief review of RFI issues to critical care medicine. CLINICAL FEATURES: A 74-yr-old woman, with an implanted pacemaker, underwent major spinal surgery. In the post-anaesthesia care unit, the cardiac monitor demonstrated graphic evidence of pacemaker malfunction but there was no apparent effect on the patient. Investigation by the hospital's biomedical personnel led to the conclusion that RFI was being interpreted by the monitor as abnormal pacemaker activity. CONCLUSION: With the emergence of portable, battery-operated communication devices, there is an increased risk of RFI within hospitals. Antennas and repeaters are required to receive and boost the signal levels of these devices to improve signal quality. They are located throughout hospitals and may be situated near patient care areas. Patient monitors may receive these signals, misinterpret them as being patient-generated and output erroneous information. In the case described, the monitor was presented with RFI signals and interpreted as pacemaker spikes, generating a tracing suggestive of pacemaker malfunction. Troubleshooting strategies and minimizing the potential impacts of RFI on patient monitors are discussed.




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1997 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.