CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Masse, E.
Right arrow Articles by Girard, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Masse, E.
Right arrow Articles by Girard, M.

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol 44, 816-819, Copyright © 1997 by Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society

ARTICLES

Direction of injection does not affect the spread of spinal bupivacaine in parturients

E Masse, P Drolet and M Girard
Department of Anaesthesia, Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital, University of Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

PURPOSE: One of the factors that can affect the distribution of local anaesthetic solutions in the subarachnoid space is the direction of the spinal needle through which injections are made. This study investigated the effect of the direction of the aperture of the Whitacre needle on the spread of hyperbaric bupivacaine in parturients undergoing elective caesarean section. METHODS: Forty healthy term parturients scheduled for caesarean delivery under spinal anaesthesia with 12 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine + 0.2 mg morphine were randomly assigned to one of two groups: needle orifice cephalad (I) or caudad (II). Spinal blocks were administered in the sitting position with patients being positioned supine immediately after. A blinded observer assessed the dermatome level of analgesia to ice every minute for the first 10 minutes, every three minutes for the following 35 min, then every 15 min until the sensory level regressed to T10. RESULTS: There was no difference between the groups regarding the maximal number of segments blocked cephalad to T11 (11.4 +/- 3.4: group I and 12.0 +/- 3.4: group II), time to highest cephalad spread of sensory block (22 +/- 10: group I and 19 +/- 10 min: group II), or time to regression to T10 (164 +/- 26: group I and 153 +/- 24 min: group II). The maximum decrease in blood pressure (33.9 +/- 9.6: group I and 36.8 +/- 11.8 mmHg: group II) and dosage of ephedrine administered (14.7 +/- 10.7: group I and 16.2 +/- 11.0 mg: group II) did not differ. CONCLUSION: The direction of the aperture of the Whitacre needle does not influence the spread of hyperbaric bupivacaine in the term parturient.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Br J AnaesthHome page
G. Hocking and J. A. W. Wildsmith
Intrathecal drug spread
Br. J. Anaesth., October 1, 2004; 93(4): 568 - 578.
[Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1997 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.