CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pattee, C.
Right arrow Articles by Milne, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pattee, C.
Right arrow Articles by Milne, B.

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol 44, 918-923, Copyright © 1997 by Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society

ARTICLES

Epidural analgesia for labour and delivery: informed consent issues

C Pattee, M Ballantyne and B Milne
Department of Anaesthesia, Queen's University, Kingston General Hospital, Ontario.

OBJECTIVE: Many anaesthetists believe that informed consent for epidural analgesia during labour is inadequate. Patients are perceived to be poorly informed and unable to cope with the information given during labour for informed consent. We reviewed these two hypotheses: A) to define complications for which patients want clear information: B) to quantify the influence of pain, anxiety, opioid premedication, and the importance of level of education, on a patient's level of satisfaction with regard to the consent process: and C) to assess how satisfactory epidural pain relief correlates with satisfaction with the consent process. METHODS: Sixty patients were surveyed during the first two months after vaginal delivery by two interviewers. Questions related to demographics, severity of labour pain, level of satisfaction with the epidural anaesthetic, risk of complications and satisfaction with information received were either categorical or scored on a scale from 0 to 10. RESULTS: All epidural related complications were considered important to disclose (8.4/10). The level of satisfaction with the consent process was 8.1/10. Patient satisfaction was not affected by opioid premedication, anxiety, pain score, education group or level of pain relief. CONCLUSION: Patients indicated they should be informed of all possible complications associated with epidural analgesia, regardless of severity or risk. In contrast to reports in the literature, non disclosure of serious risks during labour was not acceptable to parturients.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Med. EthicsHome page
H El-Wakeel, G J Taylor, and J J T Tate
What do patients really want to know in an informed consent procedure? A questionnaire-based survey of patients in the Bath area, UK.
J. Med. Ethics, October 1, 2006; 32(10): 612 - 616.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
T. Breen, T McNeil, and L Dierenfield
Obstetric anesthesia practice in Canada
Can J Anesth, December 1, 2000; 47(12): 1230 - 1242.
[Abstract]

Home page
 Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
A Jackson, R Henry, N Avery, E VanDenKerkhof, and B Milne
Informed consent for labour epidurals: what labouring women want to know
Can J Anesth, November 1, 2000; 47(11): 1068 - 1073.
[Abstract]

Home page
 Anesth. Analg.Home page
D. M. Dorantes, A. R. Tait, and N. N. Naughton
Informed Consent for Obstetric Anesthesia Research: Factors that Influence Parturients' Decisions to Participate
Anesth. Analg., August 1, 2000; 91(2): 369 - 373.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1997 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.