CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wajima, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Ogawa, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wajima, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Ogawa, R.

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol 45, 28-33, Copyright © 1998 by Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society


ARTICLES

Analgesia after upper abdominal surgery with extradural buprenorphine with lidocaine

Z Wajima, T Shitara, G Ishikawa, T Inoue and R Ogawa
Department of Anaesthesia, Chiba Hokusoh Hospital, Nippon Medical School, Japan.

PURPOSE: To determine whether the continuous low thoracic extradural administration of the same dose of lidocaine at low concentration with a high infusion rate or at high concentration with a low infusion rate in combination with a fixed dose of buprenorphine (0.4 mg.day-1) modifies postoperative pain relief. METHODS: Twenty-eight patients undergoing elective upper abdominal surgery were randomly allocated to one of two groups to receive lidocaine 2%--buprenorphine at a rate of 6.3 ml.hr-1 (2% group, n = 13) or lidocaine 6%-buprenorphine at a rate of 2.1 ml.hr-1 (6% group, n = 15). During suture of the peritoneum, mepivacaine 2% (8 ml) with 0.1 mg (0.5 ml) buprenorphine was infused extradurally. After extubation, the continuous extradural infusion was initiated. Patients were assessed for the level of analgesia with the 10 cm VAS score at rest and with the Prince Henry Pain Scale (PHPS) at 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 hr postoperatively. RESULTS: The visual analogue scale (VAS) scores at rest did not differ between the two groups except at 18 hr after surgery. The Prince Henry Pain Scale (PHPS) scores were not different between the two groups postoperatively. CONCLUSION: There was no difference in analgesia produced by the continuous extradural infusion of lidocaine 2%-buprenorphine at a rate of 6.3 ml.hr-1 and that of lidocaine 6%-buprenorphine at a rate of 2.1 ml.hr-1 following upper abdominal surgery.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
P. Lierz, A. Heinatz, B. Gustorff, P. Felleiter, Y. Gurkan, and K. Toker
Epidural Catheterization in General Anesthesia * Response
Anesth. Analg., November 1, 2003; 97(5): 1547 - 1547.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.