CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kuroda, M.
Right arrow Articles by Goto, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kuroda, M.
Right arrow Articles by Goto, F.

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol 45, 979-984, Copyright © 1998 by Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society

ARTICLES

Vecuronium dose requirement and pupillary response in a patient with olivopontocerebellar atrophy (OPCA)

M Kuroda, H Fukura, N Saruki, D Yoshikawa, T Morita and F Goto
Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimatology, Gunma University School of Medicine, Japan.

PURPOSE: Olivopontocerebellar atrophy (OPCA), a variant of spinocerebellar degeneration (Shy-Drager syndrome), is a systemic degenerative disorder affecting the neurons of multiple nuclei. We investigated the sensitivity to vecuronium and the pupillary responses to various stresses in a patient with OPCA. CLINICAL FEATURES: A 65-yr-old woman with a six-month history of OPCA underwent a left upper lobectomy for lung cancer under propofol-N2O anaesthesia. She had symptoms of dysarthria, bulbar palsy, cerebellar ataxia, Parkinsonism, myosis, pyramidal signs and muscular atrophy of the distal extremities. A cumulative dose-response curve for vecuronium was constructed, and pupillary changes in response to various noxious stimuli were evaluated with concomitant recording of the Spectral-Edge-Frequency 90% (SEF90; the frequency below which 90 percent of the EEG power is located). The dose-response curve for vecuronium and the estimated ED50 value (the 50% blocking dose of vecuronium) in this patient with OPCA were almost identical with those of five ASA I-II patients (27 micrograms.kg-1 vs 31 micrograms.kg-1). The pupil size and the SEF90 did not change after tracheal intubation or surgical stimulation in this patient, while in the control subjects (n = 3), these measures increased in response to both stresses. CONCLUSIONS: The absence of pupillary and SEF90 responses to noxious stimuli suggests a sensitivity to propofol and/or central autonomic dysfunction in patients with OPCA. Although the dose requirement of vecuronium in this patient was similar to that of the control patients, the effects of neuromuscular blockers may vary depending on the severity of muscle atrophy.




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.