CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ho-Tai, L. M.
Right arrow Articles by O'Donnell, M. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ho-Tai, L. M.
Right arrow Articles by O'Donnell, M. P.

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol 45, 206-211, Copyright © 1998 by Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society


ARTICLES

Gas leak and gastric insufflation during controlled ventilation: face mask versus laryngeal mask airway

LM Ho-Tai, JH Devitt, AG Noel and MP O'Donnell
Department of Anaesthesia, Sunnybrook Health Science Centre, University of Toronto, Ontario.

PURPOSE: To compare two airway management techniques, face mask (FM) with oropharyngeal airway and laryngeal mask airway (LMA), with respect to the effectiveness of positive pressure ventilation and airway maintenance. METHODS: After induction of anaesthesia, two airway management techniques (FM or LMA) and three peak pressures (20, 25 and 30 cm H2O) were randomly applied during controlled ventilation in 60 patients. Data collected included inspiratory and expiratory volumes and presence of gastro-oesophageal insufflation. Leak was calculated by subtracting the expiratory from the inspiratory volume, expressed as a fraction of the inspiratory volume. RESULTS: Expiratory volumes (mean +/- SD) at 20, 25 and 30 cm H2O for LMA ventilation were 893 +/- 260, 986 +/- 276 and 1006 +/- 262 respectively, and for FM ventilation 964 +/- 264, 1100 +/- 268 and 1116 +/- 261. Leak fractions at 20, 25 and 30 cm H2O for LMA ventilation were 0.21 +/- 0.15, 0.24 +/- 0.18 and 0.26 +/- 0.18 respectively, and for FM ventilation 0.14 +/- 0.09, 0.14 +/- 0.09 and 0.12 +/- 0.08. The frequency of gastro-oesophageal insufflation was 1.6%, 5% and 5% for the LMA and 5%, 15% and 26.6% for the FM for ventilation pressures of 20, 25 and 30 cm H2O respectively which was greater with LMA use. CONCLUSION: Ventilation was adequate in all patients using both techniques. Leak was pressure dependent and greater with LMA use. Most of the leak was vented to the atmosphere via the pharynx. Gastro-oesophageal insufflation was more frequent with ventilation using the face mask. LMA use with positive pressure ventilation would appear to be a better airway management method than the face mask.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
L. F. Souza, A. C. Pereira, and P. S. Lavinas
Use of Preoxygenation with the Laryngeal Mask Airway in Critical Care
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., March 1, 2007; 175(5): 521 - 521.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
C. Baillard, J.-P. Fosse, M. Sebbane, G. Chanques, F. Vincent, P. Courouble, Y. Cohen, J.-J. Eledjam, F. Adnet, and S. Jaber
Noninvasive Ventilation Improves Preoxygenation before Intubation of Hypoxic Patients
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., July 15, 2006; 174(2): 171 - 177.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
J. P Nolan, M. Colquhoun, and C. D Deakin
Gastric rupture and laryngeal mask airway: Laryngeal mask airway was not likely cause of gastric rupture
BMJ, March 5, 2005; 330(7490): 538 - 538.
[Full Text]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
S. Gander, P. Frascarolo, M. Suter, D. R. Spahn, and L. Magnusson
Positive End-Expiratory Pressure During Induction of General Anesthesia Increases Duration of Nonhypoxic Apnea in Morbidly Obese Patients
Anesth. Analg., February 1, 2005; 100(2): 580 - 584.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
N. Haslam, G C. Campbell, and J. E Duggan
Gastric rupture associated with use of the laryngeal mask airway during cardiopulmonary resuscitation
BMJ, November 20, 2004; 329(7476): 1225 - 1226.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
M. Coussa, S. Proietti, P. Schnyder, P. Frascarolo, M. Suter, D. R. Spahn, and L. Magnusson
Prevention of Atelectasis Formation During the Induction of General Anesthesia in Morbidly Obese Patients
Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2004; 98(5): 1491 - 1495.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
M. Rusca, S. Proietti, P. Schnyder, P. Frascarolo, G. Hedenstierna, D. R. Spahn, and L. Magnusson
Prevention of Atelectasis Formation During Induction of General Anesthesia
Anesth. Analg., December 1, 2003; 97(6): 1835 - 1839.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
J. R. Maltby, M. T. Beriault, N. C. Watson, D. J. Liepert, and G. H. Fick
LMA-ClassicTM and LMA-ProSealTM are effective alternatives to endotracheal intubation for gynecologic laparoscopy: [Le ML ClassiqueTM et le ML ProSealTM peuvent remplacer efficacement l'intubation endotracheale pour la laparoscopie gynecologique]
Can J Anesth, January 1, 2003; 50(1): 71 - 77.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
J. R. Maltby, M. T. Beriault, N. C. Watson, D. Liepert, and G. H. Fick
The LMA-ProSealTM is an effective alternative to tracheal intubation for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: [Le LMA-ProSealTM remplace efficacement l'intubation endotracheale pendant la cholecystectomie laparoscopique]
Can J Anesth, October 1, 2002; 49(8): 857 - 862.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
K. Aoyama, E. Yasunaga, I. Takenaka, T. Kadoya, T. Sata, and A. Shigematsu
Positive pressure ventilation during fibreoptic intubation: comparison of the laryngeal mask airway, intubating laryngeal mask and endoscopy mask techniques
Br. J. Anaesth., February 1, 2002; 88(2): 246 - 254.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
G. Sidaras and J. M. Hunter
Editorial III: Is it safe to artificially ventilate a paralysed patient through the laryngeal mask? The jury is still out
Br. J. Anaesth., June 1, 2001; 86(6): 749 - 753.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
C. Park, J.-H. Bahk, W.-S. Ahn, S.-H. Do, and K.-H. Lee
The laryngeal mask airway in infants and children
Can J Anesth, April 1, 2001; 48(4): 413 - 417.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Emerg. Med. J.Home page
V Dörges, H Ocker, V Wenzel, C Sauer, and P Schmucker
Emergency airway management by non-anaesthesia house officers--a comparison of three strategies
Emerg. Med. J., March 1, 2001; 18(2): 90 - 94.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
J. R. Maltby, M. T. Beriault, Neil. C. Watson, and G. H. Fick
Gastric distension and ventilation during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: LMA-Classic vs. tracheal intubation
Can J Anesth, July 1, 2000; 47(7): 622 - 626.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.