| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol 45, 206-211, Copyright © 1998 by Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society
ARTICLES |
LM Ho-Tai, JH Devitt, AG Noel and MP O'Donnell
Department of Anaesthesia, Sunnybrook Health Science Centre, University of Toronto, Ontario.
PURPOSE: To compare two airway management techniques, face mask (FM) with oropharyngeal airway and laryngeal mask airway (LMA), with respect to the effectiveness of positive pressure ventilation and airway maintenance. METHODS: After induction of anaesthesia, two airway management techniques (FM or LMA) and three peak pressures (20, 25 and 30 cm H2O) were randomly applied during controlled ventilation in 60 patients. Data collected included inspiratory and expiratory volumes and presence of gastro-oesophageal insufflation. Leak was calculated by subtracting the expiratory from the inspiratory volume, expressed as a fraction of the inspiratory volume. RESULTS: Expiratory volumes (mean +/- SD) at 20, 25 and 30 cm H2O for LMA ventilation were 893 +/- 260, 986 +/- 276 and 1006 +/- 262 respectively, and for FM ventilation 964 +/- 264, 1100 +/- 268 and 1116 +/- 261. Leak fractions at 20, 25 and 30 cm H2O for LMA ventilation were 0.21 +/- 0.15, 0.24 +/- 0.18 and 0.26 +/- 0.18 respectively, and for FM ventilation 0.14 +/- 0.09, 0.14 +/- 0.09 and 0.12 +/- 0.08. The frequency of gastro-oesophageal insufflation was 1.6%, 5% and 5% for the LMA and 5%, 15% and 26.6% for the FM for ventilation pressures of 20, 25 and 30 cm H2O respectively which was greater with LMA use. CONCLUSION: Ventilation was adequate in all patients using both techniques. Leak was pressure dependent and greater with LMA use. Most of the leak was vented to the atmosphere via the pharynx. Gastro-oesophageal insufflation was more frequent with ventilation using the face mask. LMA use with positive pressure ventilation would appear to be a better airway management method than the face mask.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. F. Souza, A. C. Pereira, and P. S. Lavinas Use of Preoxygenation with the Laryngeal Mask Airway in Critical Care Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., March 1, 2007; 175(5): 521 - 521. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Baillard, J.-P. Fosse, M. Sebbane, G. Chanques, F. Vincent, P. Courouble, Y. Cohen, J.-J. Eledjam, F. Adnet, and S. Jaber Noninvasive Ventilation Improves Preoxygenation before Intubation of Hypoxic Patients Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., July 15, 2006; 174(2): 171 - 177. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. P Nolan, M. Colquhoun, and C. D Deakin Gastric rupture and laryngeal mask airway: Laryngeal mask airway was not likely cause of gastric rupture BMJ, March 5, 2005; 330(7490): 538 - 538. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
S. Gander, P. Frascarolo, M. Suter, D. R. Spahn, and L. Magnusson Positive End-Expiratory Pressure During Induction of General Anesthesia Increases Duration of Nonhypoxic Apnea in Morbidly Obese Patients Anesth. Analg., February 1, 2005; 100(2): 580 - 584. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Haslam, G C. Campbell, and J. E Duggan Gastric rupture associated with use of the laryngeal mask airway during cardiopulmonary resuscitation BMJ, November 20, 2004; 329(7476): 1225 - 1226. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Coussa, S. Proietti, P. Schnyder, P. Frascarolo, M. Suter, D. R. Spahn, and L. Magnusson Prevention of Atelectasis Formation During the Induction of General Anesthesia in Morbidly Obese Patients Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2004; 98(5): 1491 - 1495. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Rusca, S. Proietti, P. Schnyder, P. Frascarolo, G. Hedenstierna, D. R. Spahn, and L. Magnusson Prevention of Atelectasis Formation During Induction of General Anesthesia Anesth. Analg., December 1, 2003; 97(6): 1835 - 1839. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. R. Maltby, M. T. Beriault, N. C. Watson, D. J. Liepert, and G. H. Fick LMA-ClassicTM and LMA-ProSealTM are effective alternatives to endotracheal intubation for gynecologic laparoscopy: [Le ML ClassiqueTM et le ML ProSealTM peuvent remplacer efficacement l'intubation endotracheale pour la laparoscopie gynecologique] Can J Anesth, January 1, 2003; 50(1): 71 - 77. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. R. Maltby, M. T. Beriault, N. C. Watson, D. Liepert, and G. H. Fick The LMA-ProSealTM is an effective alternative to tracheal intubation for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: [Le LMA-ProSealTM remplace efficacement l'intubation endotracheale pendant la cholecystectomie laparoscopique] Can J Anesth, October 1, 2002; 49(8): 857 - 862. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Aoyama, E. Yasunaga, I. Takenaka, T. Kadoya, T. Sata, and A. Shigematsu Positive pressure ventilation during fibreoptic intubation: comparison of the laryngeal mask airway, intubating laryngeal mask and endoscopy mask techniques Br. J. Anaesth., February 1, 2002; 88(2): 246 - 254. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Sidaras and J. M. Hunter Editorial III: Is it safe to artificially ventilate a paralysed patient through the laryngeal mask? The jury is still out Br. J. Anaesth., June 1, 2001; 86(6): 749 - 753. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Park, J.-H. Bahk, W.-S. Ahn, S.-H. Do, and K.-H. Lee The laryngeal mask airway in infants and children Can J Anesth, April 1, 2001; 48(4): 413 - 417. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V Dörges, H Ocker, V Wenzel, C Sauer, and P Schmucker Emergency airway management by non-anaesthesia house officers--a comparison of three strategies Emerg. Med. J., March 1, 2001; 18(2): 90 - 94. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
J. R. Maltby, M. T. Beriault, Neil. C. Watson, and G. H. Fick Gastric distension and ventilation during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: LMA-Classic vs. tracheal intubation Can J Anesth, July 1, 2000; 47(7): 622 - 626. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |