CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rautoma, P.
Right arrow Articles by Meretoja, O. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rautoma, P.
Right arrow Articles by Meretoja, O. A.

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol 45, 212-216, Copyright © 1998 by Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society


ARTICLES

Potency and hourly maintenance requirement of combinations of mivacurium and pancuronium in adults

P Rautoma, O Erkola and OA Meretoja
Department of Anaesthesia, Maria Hospital of Helsinki City Hospital, Finland.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the dose-response and maintenance requirements of a combination of mivacurium and pancuronium (cMP) in clinical practice. METHODS: In a randomised, open clinical study, 70 patients, 17-50 yr of age, were anaesthetised with propofol, alfentanil and nitrous oxide in oxygen. Thirty patients received mivacurium and 20 patients received pancuronium to establish dose-response curves for these agents. Hourly maintenance requirements of mivacurium and pancuronium to maintain 90-95% neuromuscular blockade (NMB) were determined. Thereafter, 20 additional patients received cMP in incremental doses to establish a cumulative dose-response curve for cMP followed by maintenance doses of cMP. NMB was recorded by adductor pollicis electromyography. RESULTS: The ED95 values for mivacurium and pancuronium were 100 and 66 micrograms.kg-1, respectively; and for the cMP 2:1 (in mg:mg basis), 32 micrograms.kg-1 mivacurium together with 16 micrograms.kg-1 pancuronium. This cMP was 1.8 times more potent than one parent agent (P < 0.0001). When cMP 2:1 was used, 60% of normal maintenance requirement of pancuronium reduced the requirement of mivacurium by > 90%. If cMP 20:1 was used, then 20% of normal maintenance requirement of pancuronium reduced the requirement of mivacurium by > 70%. Neostigmine 35 micrograms.kg-1 given at T1 10% recovery following cMP reversed the NMB to a TOF ratio of 0.70 in 9.5 +/- 3.9 min. CONCLUSION: These results reflect considerable synergism between mivacurium and pancuronium. The cMP is near intermediate-acting and the NMB is easily reversed with neostigmine. By using cMP, it may be possible to save some pharmacological costs during maintenance of anaesthesia.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
C. Motamed, K. Kirov, T. Lieutaud, and P. Duvaldestin
The Mechanism of Pancuronium Potentiation of Mivacurium Block: Use of the Isolated-Arm Technique
Anesth. Analg., September 1, 2000; 91(3): 732 - 735.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.