CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Webb, A. A.
Right arrow Articles by Shipton, E. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Webb, A. A.
Right arrow Articles by Shipton, E. A.

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol 45, 367-369, Copyright © 1998 by Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society


ARTICLES

Re-evaluation of i.m. ephedrine as prophylaxis against hypotension associated with spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean section

AA Webb and EA Shipton
Department of Anaesthesiology, Chris Hani Baragwanath Hospital, Johannesburg, South Africa.

PURPOSE: To assess the safety and efficacy of 37.5 mg ephedrine i.m. in preventing hypotension associated with spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean section. METHODS: In a double-blind randomised controlled study, 40 patients (20 in each group) were given either 37.5 mg ephedrine or placebo i.m. The following parameters were recorded: (i) blood pressure; (ii) heart rate; (iii) ephedrine i.v. supplementation; (iv) umbilical venous blood gases and neonatal Apgar scores. RESULTS: The incidence of hypertension in the study group was 30% compared with 20% for the control group (P:NS). There was no difference in mean highest blood pressure or mean highest heart rate between the groups. The incidence of hypotension was lower but not significantly lower in the study group (50%) than in the control group (80%) (P:NS). However, the incidence of delayed hypotension was only 10% in the study group patients compared with 50% in the control group patients (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Giving 37.5 mg ephedrine i.m. prior to spinal anaesthesia was not associated with reactive hypertension or tachycardia. Intramuscular ephedrine provided more sustained cardiovascular support than intravenous ephedrine.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
J. Cleary-Goldman, M. Negron, J. Scott, R. A. Downing, W. Camann, L. Simpson, and P. Flood
Prophylactic Ephedrine and Combined Spinal Epidural: Maternal Blood Pressure and Fetal Heart Rate Patterns
Obstet. Gynecol., September 1, 2005; 106(3): 466 - 472.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
D. Kreiser, E. Katorza, D. S. Seidman, A. Etchin, and E. Schiff
The Effect of Ephedrine on Intrapartum Fetal Heart Rate After Epidural Analgesia
Obstet. Gynecol., December 1, 2004; 104(6): 1277 - 1281.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
A. Lee, W. D. Ngan Kee, and T. Gin
Prophylactic ephedrine prevents hypotension during spinal anesthesia for Cesarean delivery but does not improve neonatal outcome: a quantitative systematic review: [L'administration prophylactique d'ephedrine previent l'hypotension pendant la rachianesthesie pour Cesarienne, mais n'ameliore pas l'evolution neonatale : une revue methodique quantitative]
Can J Anesth, June 1, 2002; 49(6): 588 - 599.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
B. T. Ayorinde, P. Buczkowski, J. Brown, J. Shah, and D. J. Buggy
Evaluation of pre-emptive intramuscular phenylephrine and ephedrine for reduction of spinal anaesthesia-induced hypotension during Caesarean section
Br. J. Anaesth., March 1, 2001; 86(3): 372 - 376.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
W. D. N. Kee, K. S. Khaw, B. B. Lee, T. K. Lau, and T. Gin
A Dose-Response Study of Prophylactic Intravenous Ephedrine for the Prevention of Hypotension During Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery
Anesth. Analg., June 1, 2000; 90(6): 1390 - 1395.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.