CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hopkins, D.
Right arrow Articles by Murphy, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hopkins, D.
Right arrow Articles by Murphy, J.

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol 45, 435-442, Copyright © 1998 by Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society

ARTICLES

Comparison of tramadol and morphine via subcutaneous PCA following major orthopaedic surgery

D Hopkins, EA Shipton, D Potgieter, CA Van derMerwe, J Boon, C De Wet and J Murphy
Department of Anaesthesiology, Hillbrow Hospital, University of The Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.

PURPOSE: To compare subcutaneous PCA tramadol with subcutaneous PCA morphine for postoperative pain relief after major orthopaedic surgery and for the incidence of side-effects. METHODS: In a double-blind randomised controlled study 40 patients (20 in each group) self-administered either tramadol or morphine for 72 hr after surgery via s.c. PCA. The following variables were recorded at various time intervals: (i) pain score by means of a visual analogue scale, (ii) drug consumption and total PCA demands, (iii) vital signs (blood pressure and heart rate), (iv) oxygen saturation and respiratory rate, and (v) side-effects (sedation, nausea/vomiting, pruritus, urinary retention and constipation). RESULTS: Both drugs provided effective analgesia. The mean consumption in the first 24 hr was 792 +/- 90 mg tramadol and 42 +/- 4 mg morphine. Thereafter, consumption of both drugs declined markedly. Moderate haemodynamic changes were observed in both the tramadol and morphine groups (with a maximum 20% decrease in mean blood pressure and a maximum 17% increase in heart rate) during the 72 hr period. Both tramadol and morphine were associated with a clinically and statistically significant (P < 0.001) decrease in oxygen saturation, but without changes in respiratory rates. Desaturation was less marked with tramadol. Tramadol appeared to cause more nausea and vomiting than morphine. Sedation was mild and only seen during the first few hours after surgery in both groups. CONCLUSION: Tramadol is an effective analgesic agent for the relief of acute postoperative pain when administered by PCA via the subcutaneous route. Under these conditions tramadol behaves much like morphine with a similar side-effect profile.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Journal of Pharmacy PracticeHome page
P. J. S. Koo
Acute Pain Management
Journal of Pharmacy Practice, August 1, 2003; 16(4): 231 - 248.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Anesth. Analg.Home page
N. Rawal, R. Allvin, A. Amilon, T. Ohlsson, and J. Hallen
Postoperative Analgesia at Home After Ambulatory Hand Surgery: A Controlled Comparison of Tramadol, Metamizol, and Paracetamol
Anesth. Analg., February 1, 2001; 92(2): 347 - 351.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
G. R. Hamilton and T. F. Baskett
In the arms of Morpheus: the development of morphine for postoperative pain relief
Can J Anesth, April 1, 2000; 47(4): 367 - 374.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.