| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol 45, 545-550, Copyright © 1998 by Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society
ARTICLES |
M Berti, G Fanelli, A Casati, D Lugani, G Aldegheri and G Torri
Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, University of Milan, IRCCS H. San Raffaele, Italy.
PURPOSE: To compare epidural infusions of bupivacaine-fentanyl and bupivacaine-morphine mixtures for postoperative pain relief after total hip replacement. METHODS: In a prospective, randomized, double-blind study, 30 ASA physical status I-II patients undergoing total hip replacement were studied. Anaesthesia was provided by combined general/epidural anaesthesia without epidural opioids. Postoperative epidural analgesia was by continuous infusion of bupivacaine 0.125% (4 ml.hr-1) with either 0.05 mg.ml-1 morphine (morphine, n = 15) or 0.005 mg.ml-1 fentanyl (fentanyl, n = 15). Visual analogue pain scale (VAS), sedation (four-point scale), respiratory rate, pulse oximetry, rescue analgesics and supplemental oxygen were recorded by a blind observer at 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 and 24 hr after surgery. RESULTS: No differences in pain relief, sedation, or non-respiratory side effects were observed between the two groups. Rescue analgesics were required in three patients in the fentanyl group (20%) and in two receiving morphine (13.3%) (P:NS). Two patients in the fentanyl group and three in the morphine group required oxygen due to SpO2 < 90% (P:NS). Both opioid/bupivacaine mixtures decreased haemoglobin oxygen saturation compared with preoperative values. The mean +/- SD SpO2 values measured at 3, 6, 12 and 24 hr were 94.4 +/- 1, 92.6 +/- 0.9, 92 +/- 0.8, and 92.8 +/- 1 in the morphine group, 95.3 +/- 0.5, 95 +/- 0.5, 94.6 +/- 1.2, and 95.6 +/- 1 in the fentanyl group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Continuous epidural infusion of bupivacaine-morphine or bupivacaine-fentanyl mixtures provided similar pain relief. Patients receiving morphine showed a more marked decrease in SpO2 than those receiving fentanyl. However, the average SpO2 remained > 90% in both groups.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Casati, A. Albertin, G. Fanelli, F. Deni, M. Berti, G. Danelli, F. Grifoni, and G. Torri A Comparison of Remifentanil and Sufentanil as Adjuvants During Sevoflurane Anesthesia with Epidural Analgesia for Upper Abdominal Surgery: Effects on Postoperative Recovery and Respiratory Function Anesth. Analg., October 1, 2000; 91(5): 1269 - 1273. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. C. Vallejo, R. P. Edwards, K. T. Shannon, B. Kaul, H. Finegold, H. L. Morrison, and S. Ramanathan Improved bowel function after gynecological surgery with epidural bupivacaine-fentanyl than bupivacaine-morphine infusion Can J Anesth, May 1, 2000; 47(5): 406 - 411. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Berti, G. Fanelli, A. Casati, A. Albertin, S. Palmisano, F. Deni, V. Perotti, and G. Torri Patient supplemented epidural analgesia after major abdominal surgery with bupivacaine/fentanyl or ropivacaine/fentanyl Can J Anesth, January 1, 2000; 47(1): 27 - 32. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |