CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sia, A. T.
Right arrow Articles by Chiu, J. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sia, A. T.
Right arrow Articles by Chiu, J. W.

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol 45, 620-625, Copyright © 1998 by Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society


ARTICLES

Intrathecal sufentanil as the sole agent in combined spinal-epidural analgesia for the ambulatory parturient

AT Sia, JL Chong, DH Tay, WK Lo, LH Chen and JW Chiu
Department of Anaesthesia, Kandang Kerbau Women And Childrens Hospital, Singapore.

PURPOSE: To compare the effect of a combination of intrathecal (i.t.) sufentanil plus bupivacaine with i.t. sufentanil alone, on the incidence of hypotension and the success of ambulation in parturients. METHODS: This was a controlled, double-blind prospective trial involving 50 parturients in early labour who had received combined spinal-epidural analgesia (CSE). They were divided equally into two groups; group A received 10 micrograms i.t. sufentanil while group B received i.t. 10 micrograms sufentanil plus 2.5 mg plain bupivacaine. The blood pressure, pain scores, the highest sensory block and the degree of motor blockade were documented over the first 30 min by an unbiased anaesthetist. The ability and the desire to ambulate was studied 30 min after CSE. The side effects were documented throughout labour. RESULTS: Group B had a higher incidence of hypotension; (12 vs 3: P < 0.01). Fewer parturients in group B could ambulate (19 vs 25: P < 0.05). Group B also had a higher sensory blockade than group A (median T4 VS T7-8: P < 0.01). Of all the 44 parturients who could ambulate, 13 desired not to do so, usually due to sedation. CONCLUSION: The quality of analgesia in all subjects in the study was excellent. Side effects were more common in the i.t. sufentanil-bupivacaine combination group.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
S. Frenea, C. Chirossel, R. Rodriguez, J.-P. Baguet, C. Racinet, and J.-F. Payen
The Effects of Prolonged Ambulation on Labor with Epidural Analgesia
Anesth. Analg., January 1, 2004; 98(1): 224 - 229.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
A. T.-H. Sia
Optimal dose of intrathecal clonidine added to sufentanil plus bupivacaine for labour analgesia
Can J Anesth, September 1, 2000; 47(9): 875 - 880.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.