CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tsui, B. C.
Right arrow Articles by Finucane, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tsui, B. C.
Right arrow Articles by Finucane, B.

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol 45, 640-644, Copyright © 1998 by Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society


ARTICLES

Confirmation of epidural catheter placement using nerve stimulation

BC Tsui, S Gupta and B Finucane
Department of Anaesthesia, University of Alberta Hospitals, Walter Mackenzie Health Sciences Centre, Edmonton, Canada.

PURPOSE: To examine the reliability of low current electrical epidural stimulation to confirm epidural catheter placement. METHODS: Forty patients with epidural catheters (19G Arrow Flextip plus) already in place for post-operative pain management were studied. An adapter (Arrow-Johans ECG Adapter) was attached to the connector of the epidural catheter. The epidural catheter and adapter were filled with normal saline. The cathode lead of the nerve stimulator was attached to the metal hub of the adapter. Catheter placement was judged to be correct or incorrect, depending upon the presence or absence of truncal or limb movement to 1 Hz stimulation (1-10 mA). A standard test dose (3 ml lidocaine 1.5% with 1:200,000 epinephrine) was then injected. The efficacy of the epidural morphine was assessed independently. RESULTS: The sensitivity and specificity of the test was 100% and 91.6% compared with the standard test dose. The positive and negative predictive value was 96% and 100%. In predicting the clinical effect of epidural morphine, the sensitivity and specificity was 96.1% and 76.9%. The positive and negative predictive value was 89% and 90%. The correlation of unilateral or bilateral motor response from the test and sensory response from the lidocaine test with sensitivity and specificity was 91.6% and 53.0%. The predictive value for unilateral response was 61% and for bilateral was 88%. CONCLUSION: This study establishes this test as a simple, objective and reliable technique for confirmation of epidural catheter placement.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
C. Motamed, F. Farhat, F. Remerand, J. Stephanazzi, A. Laplanche, and C. Jayr
An Analysis of Postoperative Epidural Analgesia Failure by Computed Tomography Epidurography
Anesth. Analg., October 1, 2006; 103(4): 1026 - 1032.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
B. C. H. Tsui
Epidural stimulation test criteria.
Anesth. Analg., September 1, 2006; 103(3): 775 - 776.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
B. C. H. Tsui
Is It Time to Perform All Thoracic Epidural Placements Under Fluoroscopy?
Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2006; 102(5): 1586 - 1586.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
P. K. Morley-Forster, A. Abotaiban, S. Ganapathy, D. E. Moulin, A. Leung, and B. Tsui
Targeted thoracic epidural blood patch placed under electrical stimulation guidance (Tsui test): [Le colmatage sanguin epidural thoracique cible, guide par la stimulation electrique (test Tsui)].
Can J Anesth, April 1, 2006; 53(4): 375 - 379.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
B. C. H. Tsui
Epidural stimulation test vs epidural ECG test for checking epidural catheter placement
Br. J. Anaesth., December 1, 2005; 95(6): 837 - 837.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
E. de Medicis, J.-P. Tetrault, R. Martin, R. Robichaud, and L. Laroche
A Prospective Comparative Study of Two Indirect Methods for Confirming the Localization of an Epidural Catheter for Postoperative Analgesia
Anesth. Analg., December 1, 2005; 101(6): 1830 - 1833.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
B. C. H. Tsui and C. K. C. Sze
An In Vitro Comparison of the Electrical Conducting Properties of Multiport Versus Single-Port Epidural Catheters for the Epidural Stimulation Test
Anesth. Analg., November 1, 2005; 101(5): 1528 - 1530.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
B. C.H. Tsui
New tool for checking epidural catheter location
Can J Anesth, October 1, 2005; 52(8): 890 - 890.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
P. Lena and R. Martin
Subdural placement of an epidural catheter detected by nerve stimulation: [Positionnement sous-dural d'un catheter epidural detecte par stimulation nerveuse et confirme par tomographie]
Can J Anesth, June 1, 2005; 52(6): 618 - 621.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
B. C. H. Tsui, D. Emery, R. R. E. Uwiera, and B. Finucane
The Use of Electrical Stimulation to Monitor Epidural Needle Advancement in a Porcine Model
Anesth. Analg., June 1, 2005; 100(6): 1611 - 1613.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
H. Tamai, S. Sawamura, H. Atarashi, K. Takeda, K. Ohe, and K. Hanaoka
The Electrical Properties of Epidural Catheters: What Are the Requirements for Nerve Stimulation Guidance?
Anesth. Analg., June 1, 2005; 100(6): 1704 - 1707.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
B. C.H. Tsui, A. M. Wagner, K. Cunningham, S. Perry, S. Desai, and R. Seal
Threshold Current of an Insulated Needle in the Intrathecal Space in Pediatric Patients
Anesth. Analg., March 1, 2005; 100(3): 662 - 665.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
B. C. H. Tsui, A. Wagner, D. Cave, and R. Seal
Threshold Current for an Insulated Epidural Needle in Pediatric Patients
Anesth. Analg., September 1, 2004; 99(3): 694 - 696.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
B. C. H. Tsui and S. Malherbe
Inadvertent Cervical Epidural Catheter Placement via the Caudal Route Using Electrical Stimulation
Anesth. Analg., July 1, 2004; 99(1): 259 - 261.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
S. A. Lang and J. Arraf
Analgesia in bariatric patients following upper abdominal surgery
Can J Anesth, March 1, 2004; 51(3): 276 - 276.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
B. C. H. Tsui, S. Malherbe, J. Koller, and K. Aronyk
Reversal of an Unintentional Spinal Anesthetic by Cerebrospinal Lavage
Anesth. Analg., February 1, 2004; 98(2): 434 - 436.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
R. Martin, M. Pirlet, M. Parent, and F. Gingras
Evaluation of epidural catheter tip position
Can J Anesth, November 1, 2003; 50(9): 963 - 963.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
S. M. Goobie, C. J. Montgomery, R. Basu, J. McFadzean, G. J. O'Connor, K. Poskitt, and B. C. H. Tsui
Confirmation of Direct Epidural Catheter Placement Using Nerve Stimulation in Pediatric Anesthesia
Anesth. Analg., October 1, 2003; 97(4): 984 - 988.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
V. N. Naik, I. Devito, and S. H. Halpern
Cusum analysis is a useful tool to assess resident proficiency at insertion of labour epidurals: [L'analyse des sommes cumulees permet d'evaluer la maitrise, par les residents, de l'insertion du catheter epidural pour le travail obstetrical]
Can J Anesth, August 1, 2003; 50(7): 694 - 698.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
S. A. Lang, B. Tsui, T. Grau, T. Kasai, K. Yaegashi, H. Hirose, and Y. Tanaka
New Avenues of Epidural Research * Response
Anesth. Analg., July 1, 2003; 97(1): 292 - 293.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
B. C. H. Tsui, R. Seal, and J. Koller
Thoracic Epidural Catheter Placement Via the Caudal Approach in Infants by Using Electrocardiographic Guidance
Anesth. Analg., August 1, 2002; 95(2): 326 - 330.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
B. C.H. Tsui, B. Finucane, and K. Hayatsu
Verifying Accurate Placement of an Epidural Catheter Tip Using Electrical Stimulation * Response
Anesth. Analg., June 1, 2002; 94(6): 1670 - 1671.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
B. C. H. Tsui, R. Seal, J. Koller, L. Entwistle, R. Haugen, and R. Kearney
Thoracic Epidural Analgesia Via the Caudal Approach in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Fundoplication Using Nerve Stimulation Guidance
Anesth. Analg., November 1, 2001; 93(5): 1152 - 1155.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
P. J. O'Connor, G. L. Moysa, and B. T Finucane
Thoracic Epidural Anesthesia for Bilateral Reduction Mammoplasty in a Patient with Klippel-Feil Syndrome
Anesth. Analg., February 1, 2001; 92(2): 514 - 516.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
B. C.H. Tsui, S. Gupta, D. Emery, and B. Finucane
Detection of subdural placement of epidural catheter using nerve stimulation
Can J Anesth, May 1, 2000; 47(5): 471 - 473.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.