CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Le Coq, G.
Right arrow Articles by Benhamou, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Le Coq, G.
Right arrow Articles by Benhamou, D.

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol 45, 719-723, Copyright © 1998 by Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society

ARTICLES

Risk factors of inadequate pain relief during epidural analgesia for labour and delivery

G Le Coq, B Ducot and D Benhamou
Department of Anesthesia, Hopital Antoine-Beclere, Clamart, France.

PURPOSE: To determine the causes of failure of epidural analgesia during labour and delivery. METHODS: During six months, pregnant patients receiving epidural analgesia and delivering vaginally were studied prospectively. Bupivacaine 0.125% was used for the initial bolus dose and subsequent continuous infusion. Top-ups of the same solution were used for inadequate pain relief assessed using a visual analogue pain score (VAPS) and/or by clinical examination. Inadequate pain relief was defined as the need for > or = 2 top-ups in addition to epidural infusion and failure during delivery as VAPS > or = 30 mm during the expulsion phase. RESULTS: 1009 patients delivered during this period, 596 had epidural analgesia for vaginal delivery of a live infant and data were complete in 456. Inadequate pain relief during labour and during delivery were found in 5.3% and 19.7% of patients. Risk factors of inadequate pain relief included: inadequate analgesic efficacy of the first dose (Odds ratio: 3.5, P = 0.001) and posterior presentation (Odds ratio: 5.6, P = 0.001). Radicular pain during epidural placement was associated with failure during labour (Odds ratio: 3.9, P = 0.05). Duration of epidural analgesia > six hours (Odds ratio: 9.1, P = 0.001) was a risk factor for insufficient pain relief during labour whereas duration of epidural analgesia < one hour was associated with pain during delivery (Odds ratio: 18.3, P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Several obstetrical and epidural-related factors increase the risk of inadequate epidural analgesia. For some, simple changes of practice pattern may lead to improved pain relief.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Br J AnaesthHome page
J. C. Tortosa, N. S. Parry, F. J. Mercier, J. X. Mazoit, and D. Benhamou
Efficacy of augmentation of epidural analgesia for Caesarean section
Br. J. Anaesth., October 1, 2003; 91(4): 532 - 535.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
T. Grau
The evaluation of ultrasound imaging for neuraxial anesthesia
Can J Anesth, June 1, 2003; 50(90001): R7 - 7.
[Full Text]

Home page
 Anesth. Analg.Home page
P. E. Hess, S. D. Pratt, T. P. Lucas, C. G. Miller, T. Corbett, N. Oriol, and M. C. Sarna
Predictors of Breakthrough Pain During Labor Epidural Analgesia
Anesth. Analg., August 1, 2001; 93(2): 414 - 418.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Anesth. Analg.Home page
P. E. Hess, S. D. Pratt, A. K. Soni, M. C. Sarna, and N. E. Oriol
An Association Between Severe Labor Pain and Cesarean Delivery
Anesth. Analg., April 1, 2000; 90(4): 881 - 886.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.