CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brunschwiler, M.
Right arrow Articles by Gamulin, Z.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brunschwiler, M.
Right arrow Articles by Gamulin, Z.

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol 45, 735-740, Copyright © 1998 by Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society

ARTICLES

Comparison of clonidine, morphine or placebo mixed with bupivacaine during continuous spinal anaesthesia

M Brunschwiler, E Van Gessel, A Forster, A Bruce and Z Gamulin
Department of Anaesthesiology, University Hospital of Geneva, Switzerland.

PURPOSE: To compare intraoperative anaesthetic and haemodynamic effects of clonidine-bupivacaine, morphine-bupivacaine and placebo-bupivacaine combinations during continuous spinal anaesthesia. METHODS: Thirty six geriatric patients, undergoing knee replacement using continuous spinal anaesthesia were randomly assigned to: Placebo (n = 12), clonidine (n = 12) and morphine (n = 12), where 1 ml saline, 0.15 mg clonidine or 0.15 mg morphine were mixed with 10 mg bupivacaine 0.5%. Anaesthetic variables studied were maximal sensory level and degree of motor block, duration of surgical analgesia and duration of anaesthesia. Changes in systolic arterial pressure and vasopressor requirements were evaluated. RESULTS: Maximal sensory level and degree of motor block were comparable among the groups. Before surgery two patients in the placebo group, three in the clonidine and one in the morphine group received one additional ml bupivacaine 0.5% because of inadequate anaesthesia and were not considered for determination of duration of surgical analgesia. In the remainder, 1/9 in the clonidine group, 8/10 in placebo and 8/11 in morphine (P < 0.05) received reinjection of bupivacaine for surgical pain. These injections were given about 2 1/2 hr after the initial intrathecal injection, the duration of anaesthesia being about four hours. During the first 30 min after the initial injection the decrease in systolic pressure was greater in the clonidine and morphine than in the placebo group (P < 0.05). Thereafter, vasopressor requirements were higher only in the clonidine group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: In elderly patients 0.15 mg clonidine but not 0.15 mg morphine prolonged surgical analgesia when added to 10 mg plain bupivacaine.




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.