CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Reich, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by Buckley, S. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Reich, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by Buckley, S. G.

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol 45, 794-797, Copyright © 1998 by Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society

ARTICLES

Comparison of the cardiovascular effects of cisatracurium and vecuronium in patients with coronary artery disease

DL Reich, J Mulier, J Viby-Mogensen, SN Konstadt, HK van Aken, FS Jensen, M DePerio and SG Buckley
Department of Anesthesiology, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY, USA. dreich@smtplink.mssm.edu

PURPOSE: Cisatracurium besylate (Nimbex Injection, Glaxo Wellcome Inc., Research Triangle Park, NC) is an intermediate-acting bis-benzylisoquinolinium neuromuscular blocking drug that is one of the stereoisomers of atracurium. At doses < or = 8 x ED95, it caused no clinically important cardiovascular side effects or histamine release in healthy patients. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the haemodynamic effects of high doses of cisatracurium in patients with coronary artery disease. METHODS: One hundred patients undergoing myocardial revascularization participated in a pilot study (seven patients) and a double-blinded, randomized, controlled trial comparing the haemodynamic effects of cisatracurium with vecuronium at three centres. The patients were anaesthetized using oxygen 100%, with etomidate, fentanyl and a benzodiazepine, and tracheal intubation was facilitated using succinylcholine. After baseline haemodynamic measurements, the study drug was administered over 5-10 sec according to group assignment: Group A (pilot) cisatracurium, 0.20 mg.kg-1 (4 x ED95), (n = 7); Group B-cisatracurium, 0.30 mg.kg-1 (6 x ED95), (n x ED95), (n = 31); Group C-vecuronium, 0.30 mg.kg-1 (6 x ED95), (n = 31); Group D cisatracurium, 0.40 mg.kg-1 (8 x ED95), (n = 21); Group E-vecuronium, 0.30 mg.kg-1 (6 x ED95), (n = 10). The haemodynamic measurements were repeated at 2, 5, and 10 min after cisatracurium or vecuronium. RESULTS: Two patients in Group D had > 20% decreases in MAP, but only one required therapy for hypotension. The haemodynamic changes from pre- to post-injection in the cisatracurium patients were minimal and similar to patients receiving vecuronium. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with coronary artery disease, rapid cisatracurium (4-8 x ED95) boluses and vecuronium (6 x ED95) result in minor, clinically insignificant haemodynamic side effects.




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.