CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Woodward, D. K.
Right arrow Articles by Granger, K. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Woodward, D. K.
Right arrow Articles by Granger, K. A.

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol 45, 888-892, Copyright © 1998 by Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society

ARTICLES

Massive pulmonary embolism in late pregnancy

DK Woodward, RJ Birks and KA Granger
Department of Anaesthesia, Northern General Hospital, Sheffield, United Kingdom.

PURPOSE: To describe the management problems presented by a case of acute massive pulmonary embolism in a labouring woman. CLINICAL FEATURES: A case of massive pulmonary embolism is described in a woman who presented in early labour at thirty-eight weeks gestation. Immediate management involved the administration of oxygen and intravenous heparin, and transfer to the regional cardiothoracic centre. Pulmonary angiography confirmed the diagnosis of massive pulmonary embolism, but attempts at percutaneous catheter disruption of the clot were of only temporary benefit. The patient subsequently underwent Caesarean section under general anaesthesia, followed minutes later (because of an abrupt deterioration in her condition) by surgical pulmonary embolectomy. The outcome was successful for both mother and child. CONCLUSION: In cases of acute massive pulmonary embolism presenting in late pregnancy and in labour, the risks and benefits of surgical embolectomy, pharmacological thrombolysis, or attempts at mechanical clot disruption have to be weighed on an individual basis. Management at the referral centre was facilitated by having cardiothoracic and obstetric facilities on the same site.




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.