CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Poblete, B.
Right arrow Articles by Gamulin, Z.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Poblete, B.
Right arrow Articles by Gamulin, Z.

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol 46, 34-39, Copyright © 1999 by Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society

ARTICLES

Efficacy of three test doses to detect epidural catheter misplacement

B Poblete, EF Van Gessel, G Gaggero and Z Gamulin
Department of Anaesthesiology, University Hospital of Geneva, Switzerland.

PURPOSE: To determine among three currently used epidural test doses which is the most reliable for the detection of accidental intrathecal misplacement of an epidural catheter, and which clinical sign is to be used as a marker. METHODS: Ninety orthopedic patients were allocated to either the continuous epidural or the continuous spinal group according to age, < or > 70 yr. They received, in a randomized, double-blind fashion, one of the three solutions: 60 mg lidocaine 2% (L2%), 7.5 mg bupivacaine 0.25% (B0.25%), or 15 mg bupivacaine 0.5% (B0.5%); all three solutions contained epinephrine. Objective variables studied every two minutes over the first ten minutes after injection included: presence of a sensory level > or = T12, presence of a motor block > or = 1, and anesthesia of segments L1, L2, S2 and S5. Subjective variables studied over the same period included paresthesias, sensation of warmth or cold, and muscle weakness. RESULTS: When using presence of motor block > or = 1 on the Bromage scale, the administration of 60 mg L2% with epinephrine identified all patients having an intrathecal catheter six minutes after injection, whereas none of the patients receiving the same solution through the epidural catheter presented a motor block. This was not the case for the other two solutions studied. CONCLUSION: Lidocaine 2% with epinephrine at a dose of 60 mg is the test dose of choice to detect the intrathecal misplacement of an epidural catheter. The presence of motor block > or = 1 is the only reliable clinical sign.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Br J AnaesthHome page
M. Camorcia, G. Capogna, G. Lyons, and M. Columb
Epidural test dose with levobupivacaine and ropivacaine: determination of ED50 motor block after spinal administration
Br. J. Anaesth., June 1, 2004; 92(6): 850 - 853.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Anesth. Analg.Home page
Y. Beilin, A. Nair, I. Arnold, H. H. Bernstein, J. Zahn, S. Hossain, and C. A. Bodian
A Comparison of Epidural Infusions in the Combined Spinal/Epidural Technique for Labor Analgesia
Anesth. Analg., April 1, 2002; 94(4): 927 - 932.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.