CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cheam, E. W.
Right arrow Articles by Ha, V. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cheam, E. W.
Right arrow Articles by Ha, V. W.

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol 46, 49-51, Copyright © 1999 by Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society

ARTICLES

Low dose mivacurium is less effective than succinylcholine in electroconvulsive therapy

EW Cheam, LA Critchley, PT Chui, JC Yap and VW Ha
Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, N.T., PRC.

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of low dose (LD) mivacurium (0.08 mg.kg-1) with LD succinylcholine (0.5 mg.kg-1) in modifying seizure activity during electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). Partial muscle relaxation is used in ECT to prevent violent muscle contractions. Current practice is to use LD succinylcholine which has several undesirable side effects. METHOD: Sixteen depressed, but otherwise healthy, patients, aged 27-67 yr were studied. In a randomized, double-blind, cross-over study, either LD mivacurium or LD succinylcholine was given at consecutive ECTs 120 and 30 sec respectively before inducing ECT. Neuromuscular blockade following mivacurium was not reversed. Seizure modification was scored--0 = no seizure activity, 1 = over-modified, 2 = desired level, 3 = under-modified, 4 = unmodified. Duration of seizures, time to first breath and adequate ventilation, ability to protrude tongue and sustain hand grip for five seconds were recorded. Paired t-tests and Wilcoxon matched pairs test were used to compare data. P < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Seizure modification was better (mean (range)) after succinylcholine 2.06(1-3) than after mivacurium 2.56(2-4) (P < 0.05). Mivacurium was unsatisfactory in eight cases compared with two cases after succinylcholine. The study was terminated early because of unsatisfactory seizure control. Clinical assessments of recovery from both relaxants were similar. CONCLUSION: Low dose mivacurium is unsuitable for use in ECT.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Anesth. Analg.Home page
T. Werawatganon, O. Kyokong, S. Charuluxananan, and S. Punyatavorn
Muscular Injury After Succinylcholine and Electroconvulsive Therapy
Anesth. Analg., June 1, 2004; 98(6): 1676 - 1679.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Anesth. Analg.Home page
Z. Ding and P. F. White
Anesthesia for Electroconvulsive Therapy
Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2002; 94(5): 1351 - 1364.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Anesth. Analg.Home page
A. G. Kadar, B. A. Kramer, M. C. Barth, and P. F. White
Rapacuronium: An Alternative To Succinylcholine For Electroconvulsive Therapy
Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2001; 92(5): 1171 - 1172.
[Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.