CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hooper, J.
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, D. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hooper, J.
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, D. H.

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol 46, 925-929, Copyright © 1999 by Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society

ARTICLES

Tourniquet inflation during arthroscopic knee ligament surgery does not increase postoperative pain

J Hooper, OP Rosaeg, B Krepski and DH Johnson
Department of Anesthesiology, The Ottawa Hospital-Civic Campus, ON, Canada.

PURPOSE: A double-blind clinical trial was conducted to determine the effect of inflation of a thigh tourniquet during anterior cruciate ligament repair on arthroscopic visibility, duration of procedure, postoperative pain and opioid consumption. METHODS: Thirty patients were randomly allocated into two groups; Group I had the thigh tourniquet inflated during surgery whereas the tourniquet was not inflated in Group II patients. All patients received standardized general anesthesia and postoperative pain management. Supplemental analgesia was provided with i.v. morphine via a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) apparatus. Verbal pain rating scores (0-10) were obtained after surgery. RESULTS: Arthroscopic visibility was impaired in Group II patients (P < 0.0001), but this was ameliorated by increased irrigation flow or addition of epinephrine. Duration of surgery was similar in both groups. There was no difference between groups in postoperative morphine consumption (9.8 +/- 7.1 mg in Group I vs 11.4 +/- 10.2 mg in Group II) or in postoperative pain scores between groups. CONCLUSION: Inflation of a thigh tourniquet did not result in increased pain or opioid consumption after arthroscopic ACL surgery. Arthroscopic visibility was somewhat impaired in some patients without the use of tourniquet. Finally, the duration of the surgical procedure was not increased in patients where the tourniquet was not inflated during the ACL repair.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Br J AnaesthHome page
M. Carles, J. Dellamonica, J. Roux, D. Lena, J. Levraut, J. F. Pittet, P. Boileau, and M. Raucoules-Aime
Sevoflurane but not propofol increases interstitial glycolysis metabolites availability during tourniquet-induced ischaemia reperfusion
Br. J. Anaesth., January 1, 2008; 100(1): 29 - 35.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.